Literature DB >> 15916210

Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: practice patterns of obstetrician-gynecologists.

Victoria H Coleman1, Kristine Erickson, Jay Schulkin, Stanley Zinberg, Benjamin P Sachs.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess obstetrician-gynecologists' current practice patterns and opinions regarding vaginal birth after cesarean delivery (VBAC). STUDY
DESIGN: Questionnaires were mailed to a random sample of 1,200 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) fellows in July 2003. Information was gathered on percentage of cesarean and VBAC deliveries performed, factors influencing changes in these rates in the past 5 years, hospital protocol regarding VBAC and factors influencing the recommendation of VBAC.
RESULTS: Fifty-three percent of questionnaires were returned to ACOG after 3 mailings. Approximately 49% of respondents reported that they were performing more cesarean deliveries than they were 5 years earlier. The primary reasons for this increase were the risk of liability and patient preference for delivery method. More than 25% of physicians reported that they practiced in hospitals that do not follow the ACOG guidelines with respect to resources and immediate availability. Almost all (98.2%) respondents agreed that they knew the risks and benefits of VBAC. However, only 61% reported feeling competent in determining which patients will have a successful VBAC.
CONCLUSION: Obstetrician-gynecologists seem to be aware of the risks and benefits of VBAC; however, there is some doubt as to who should be offered a trial of labor and what predicts a successful VBAC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15916210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reprod Med        ISSN: 0024-7758            Impact factor:   0.142


  6 in total

Review 1.  Economic Evaluations Comparing a Trial of Labor with an Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Anna Joy Rogers; Nathaniel G Rogers; Meredith L Kilgore; Akila Subramaniam; Lorie M Harper
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 5.725

2.  Outcomes of trial of labor after cesarean birth by provider type in low-risk women.

Authors:  Matthew S Fore; Amanda A Allshouse; Nicole S Carlson; K Joseph Hurt
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.689

3.  Relationship between malpractice litigation pressure and rates of cesarean section and vaginal birth after cesarean section.

Authors:  Y Tony Yang; Michelle M Mello; S V Subramanian; David M Studdert
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Clinicians' views of factors influencing decision-making for caesarean section: A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies.

Authors:  Sunita Panda; Cecily Begley; Deirdre Daly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Examining the Impact of the Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Risk Calculator Estimation on Trial of Labor After Cesarean Counseling.

Authors:  Erin Jeffries; Amy Falcone-Wharton; Joanne Daggy; Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds
Journal:  MDM Policy Pract       Date:  2019-05-27

6.  Attitudes of US obstetricians toward a combined tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine for adults.

Authors:  Sarah J Clark; Soukaina Adolphe; Matthew M Davis; Anne E Cowan; Katrina Kretsinger
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.