Literature DB >> 15916116

A comparison of the quality of life of hearing-impaired people as estimated by three different utility measures.

Garry R Barton1, John Bankart, Adrian C Davis.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the quality of life of hearing-impaired adults, as assessed by three different utility measures - the EuroQol (EQ-5D), the Health Utilities Index Mark III (HUI3), and the SF-6D (derived from the SF-36 questionnaire). Measuring quality of life in terms of utility enables the benefits of many interventions to be compared on a common scale, where 0 corresponds to death and 1 to perfect health. Utility scores for 915 new referrals (mean age 69 years, 55% male) to four UK audiology clinics were estimated. The mean utility scores on the EQ-5D (0.79), SF-6D (0.77), and HUI3 (0.56) were all significantly different from each other The agreement between measures was most commonly moderate according to the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC =0.36 to 0.58). This suggests that different utility measures will provide different estimates of the effectiveness of hearing aid provision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15916116     DOI: 10.1080/14992020500057566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  17 in total

Review 1.  Health-related quality of life and hearing aids: a tutorial.

Authors:  Harvey B Abrams; Theresa H Chisolm; Rachel McArdle
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005

2.  Counselling of hearing aid users is highly cost-effective.

Authors:  Arja Vuorialho; Petri Karinen; Martti Sorri
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-06-24       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Measuring preferences for cost-utility analysis: how choice of method may influence decision-making.

Authors:  Christine M McDonough; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  A longitudinal comparison of 5 preference-weighted health state classification systems in persons with intervertebral disk herniation.

Authors:  Christine M McDonough; Tor D Tosteson; Anna N A Tosteson; Alan M Jette; Margaret R Grove; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Health state preference scores for children with permanent childhood hearing loss: a comparative analysis of the QWB and HUI3.

Authors:  Laura Smith-Olinde; Scott D Grosse; Frank Olinde; Patti F Martin; John M Tilford
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  The classification systems of the EQ-5D, the HUI II and the SF-6D: what do they have in common?

Authors:  Uwe Konerding; Jörn Moock; Thomas Kohlmann
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Health state utility values in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Zachary M Soler; Eve Wittenberg; Rodney J Schlosser; Jess C Mace; Timothy L Smith
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Quality of life after intervention with a cochlear implant or hearing aid.

Authors:  Kevin J Contrera; Joshua Betz; Lingsheng Li; Caitlin R Blake; Yoon K Sung; Janet S Choi; Frank R Lin
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2016-01-17       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Comparison of health-related quality of life measures for chronic renal failure: quality of well-being scale, short-form-6D, and the kidney disease quality of life instrument.

Authors:  Karen L Saban; Kevin T Stroupe; Fred B Bryant; Domenic J Reda; Margaret M Browning; Denise M Hynes
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-09-13       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Age-dependent cost-utility of pediatric cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Yevgeniy R Semenov; Susan T Yeh; Meena Seshamani; Nae-Yuh Wang; Emily A Tobey; Laurie S Eisenberg; Alexandra L Quittner; Kevin D Frick; John K Niparko
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.