Literature DB >> 15915798

Not the same old hindsight bias: outcome information distorts a broad range of retrospective judgments.

Amy Bradfield1, Gary L Wells.   

Abstract

The hindsight bias (e.g., Fischhoff, 1975) illustrates that outcome information can make people believe that they would have (or did) predict an outcome that they would not (or did not) actually predict. In two experiments, participants (N = 226) made a prediction immediately before receiving outcome information. Therefore, participants could not distort or misremember their predictions to make them align with the outcome information. In both experiments, participants distorted their reports of how certain they recalled having been in their prediction, how good of a basis they had for making the prediction, how long they took to make the prediction, and so forth. Experiment 2 showed that these effects were diminished when participants engaged in private thought about the upcoming questions prior to receiving outcome information, suggesting that the effect is not due to impression management concerns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15915798     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  10 in total

1.  Hindsight bias: a by-product of knowledge updating?

Authors:  U Hoffrage; R Hertwig; G Gigerenzer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  "I knew we would win": hindsight bias for favorable and unfavorable team decision outcomes.

Authors:  T A Louie; M T Curren; K R Harich
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2000-04

3.  Reducing the hindsight bias utilizing attorney closing arguments.

Authors:  M J Stallard; D L Worthington
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  1998-12

4.  An integration of hindsight bias and counterfactual thinking: decision-making and drug courier profiles.

Authors:  J K Robbennolt; M S Sobus
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  1997-10

5.  Hindsight bias: an interaction of automatic and motivational factors?

Authors:  W Hell; G Gigerenzer; S Gauggel; M Mall; M Müller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1988-11

6.  Hindsight bias among physicians weighing the likelihood of diagnoses.

Authors:  H R Arkes; R L Wortmann; P D Saville; A R Harkness
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1981-04

7.  When debiasing backfires: accessible content and accessibility experiences in debiasing hindsight.

Authors:  Lawrence J Sanna; Norbert Schwarz; Shevaun L Stocker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  An inferential approach to the knew-it-all-along phenomenon.

Authors:  Lioba Werth; Fritz Strack
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2003 Jul-Sep

9.  Hindsight bias in gustatory judgments.

Authors:  Rüdiger F Pohl; Stefan Schwarz; Sabine Sczesny; Dagmar Stahlberg
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2003

10.  Hindsight bias in economic expectations: I knew all along what I want to hear.

Authors:  Erik Hölzl; Erich Kirchler; Christa Rodler
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2002-06
  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  The Clinical Global Impression Scale and the influence of patient or staff perspective on outcome.

Authors:  Thomas Forkmann; Anne Scherer; Maren Boecker; Markus Pawelzik; Ralf Jostes; Siegfried Gauggel
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 3.630

2.  Perspective-taking and hindsight bias: When the target is oneself and/or a peer.

Authors:  Harry L Hom
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2022-01-22

3.  Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of immunocompromised patients infected with Pneumocystis jirovecii in a twelve-year retrospective study from Norway.

Authors:  Stine Grønseth; Tormod Rogne; Raisa Hannula; Bjørn Olav Åsvold; Jan Egil Afset; Jan Kristian Damås
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.090

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.