Literature DB >> 15915792

Perspective taking during reading: an on-line investigation of the illusory transparency of intention.

Kristin M Weingartner1, Celia M Klin.   

Abstract

Although proficient readers must be reasonably successful at keeping track of what information they share with characters and what information is privileged to them, there is evidence that they are unable to do so with complete accuracy. Keysar (1994) used off-line tasks to demonstrate that readers sometimes mistakenly use privileged information when evaluating a character's interpretation of an ambiguous message. After we replicated Keysar's (1994) findings (Experiment 1), the results of an on-line task indicated that this "illusory transparency of intention" extends to natural reading (Experiment 2). In Experiment 3, we provided preliminary support for the hypothesis that readers' accuracy in assessing a given character's perspective is influenced by whether or not that character is in the focus of the story. The results are discussed with regard to two competing theoretical views: the construal view and the standard view.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15915792     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  6 in total

1.  Noun-phrase anaphors and focus: the informational load hypothesis.

Authors:  A Almor
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Comprehension strategies in the development of a mental model.

Authors:  E J O'Brien; J E Albrecht
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  The role of construal processes in overconfident predictions about the self and others.

Authors:  D W Griffin; D Dunning; L Ross
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1990-12

4.  Egocentric empathy gaps between owners and buyers: misperceptions of the endowment effect.

Authors:  L Van Boven; D Dunning; G Loewenstein
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2000-07

5.  The role of perspective in the accessibility of goals during reading.

Authors:  J E Albrecht; E J O'Brien; R A Mason; J L Myers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  The illusory transparency of intention: linguistic perspective taking in text.

Authors:  B Keysar
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.468

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Psychological essentialist reasoning and perspective taking during reading: a donkey is not a zebra, but a plate can be a clock.

Authors:  Steven Frisson; Mary Wakefield
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-02

2.  Lifting the curse of knowing: How feedback improves perspective-taking.

Authors:  Debby Damen; Marije van Amelsvoort; Per van der Wijst; Monique Pollmann; Emiel Krahmer
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 2.143

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.