Literature DB >> 15915508

Bystander cell proliferation is modulated by the number of adjacent cells that were exposed to ionizing radiation.

Bogdan I Gerashchenko1, Roger W Howell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Direct cell-to-cell contact appears to be a prerequisite for the proliferative response of bystander WB-F344 cells co-cultured with irradiated cells; however, neither gap junctional intercellular communication nor long-range factors released into the medium appear to be involved (Cytometry 2003;56A:71-80). The present work investigated whether the proliferative bystander response depends on the number of irradiated cells (cells exposed to external gamma-rays or cells exposed to short-range beta-particles emitted by DNA-incorporated (3)H-thymidine) that are adjacent to unirradiated bystander cells.
METHODS: Subconfluent monolayers of rat liver epithelial cells (WB-F344) were incubated in the presence of (methyl-(3)H)thymidine at a concentration of 5.8 kBq/ml for 18 h. Radiolabeled cells containing 0.7 x 10(-3) Bq/cell (absorbed dose: 0.14 Gy) were plated together with unlabeled cells in proportions of 6% and 94%, 12% and 88%, 25% and 75%, 50% and 50%, and 75% and 25%, respectively, keeping constant the total number of plated cells. In a parallel experiment, cells acutely exposed to 5 Gy of (137)Cs gamma-rays were plated with unirradiated cells in the same proportions. In both experiments, cells were co-cultured for 24 h followed by a flow cytometric study of their proliferation. The two cell populations in the co-cultures were distinguished by staining one population with carboxyfluorescein diacetate, succinimidyl ester, which metabolizes intracellularly.
RESULTS: Increasing the fraction of irradiated cells relative to unirradiated bystander cells led to an increase in proliferation of bystander cells. Specifically, in co-cultures in which irradiated cells were initially mixed with unirradiated cells in proportions of 50% and 50% and of 75% and 25%, respectively, bystander cells showed a statistically significant increase of their proliferation compared with the controls.
CONCLUSIONS: The proliferative response of WB-F344 bystander cells is modulated by the number of adjacent cells that are exposed to ionizing radiation from external gamma-rays or intracellularly emitted (3)H beta-particles. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15915508     DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.20150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry A        ISSN: 1552-4922            Impact factor:   4.355


  9 in total

Review 1.  Challenges and progress in predicting biological responses to incorporated radioactivity.

Authors:  R W Howell; P V S V Neti; M Pinto; B I Gerashchenko; V R Narra; E I Azzam
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 0.972

2.  Investigation of adaptive responses in bystander cells in 3D cultures containing tritium-labeled and unlabeled normal human fibroblasts.

Authors:  Massimo Pinto; Edouard I Azzam; Roger W Howell
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Bystander responses in three-dimensional cultures containing radiolabelled and unlabelled human cells.

Authors:  M Pinto; E I Azzam; R W Howell
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 0.972

4.  Bystander effect in tumor cells produced by Iodine-125 labeled human lymphocytes.

Authors:  Omar Mamlouk; Pichumani Balagurumoorthy; Ketai Wang; S James Adelstein; Amin I Kassis
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 2.694

5.  Induction of lethal bystander effects in human breast cancer cell cultures by DNA-incorporated Iodine-125 depends on phenotype.

Authors:  John M Akudugu; Edouard I Azzam; Roger W Howell
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 2.694

6.  Human Health and the Biological Effects of Tritium in Drinking Water: Prudent Policy Through Science - Addressing the ODWAC New Recommendation.

Authors:  S Dingwall; C E Mills; N Phan; K Taylor; D R Boreham
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Proteome analysis of proliferative response of bystander cells adjacent to cells exposed to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Bogdan I Gerashchenko; Akira Yamagata; Ken Oofusa; Katsutoshi Yoshizato; Sonia M de Toledo; Roger W Howell
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.984

8.  Increased frequency of spontaneous neoplastic transformation in progeny of bystander cells from cultures exposed to densely ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Manuela Buonanno; Sonia M de Toledo; Edouard I Azzam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  What is the Role of the Bystander Response in Radionuclide Therapies?

Authors:  Darren Brady; Joe M O'Sullivan; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 6.244

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.