Literature DB >> 15915317

Acceptability of routine antenatal psychosocial assessments to women from English and non-English speaking backgrounds.

S Matthey1, T White, J Phillips, R Taouk, T T Chee, B Barnett.   

Abstract

The acceptability of routine psychosocial assessments to women and staff at an antenatal clinic of a public hospital in Sydney, Australia, was investigated. 104 English-speaking women had a telephone interview within a few days of the psychosocial assessment, and 65 of these women also participated in a telephone interview 5-8 weeks after the birth. 14 midwives who had administered the questions were also interviewed. These three sets of interviews indicated that the majority of women and staff considered the psychosocial questions to be appropriate and helpful. Prior to introducing a shorter version of the psychosocial assessment for all women, consultations took place with health professionals and community women from Arabic-speaking (n = 30) and Vietnamese-speaking (n = 39) backgrounds to determine the expected suitability of such questions to women from these ethnic backgrounds. The only consistent concern was that the term 'husband' should replace 'partner' when interviewing Arabic-speaking women. Telephone interviews were then conducted with a sample of Arabic-speaking (n = 48) and Vietnamese-speaking (n = 50) women within a few days after they had been to the clinic. As with the English-speaking women, most considered the questions to be appropriate and acceptable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15915317     DOI: 10.1007/s00737-005-0076-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health        ISSN: 1434-1816            Impact factor:   3.633


  13 in total

Review 1.  Prenatal and postpartum maternal psychological distress and infant development: a systematic review.

Authors:  Dawn Kingston; Suzanne Tough; Heather Whitfield
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  2012-10

2.  Assessing for psychosocial morbidity in pregnant women.

Authors:  Stephen Matthey
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Identification of postpartum depression.

Authors:  Dorothy K Y Sit; Katherine L Wisner
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.190

4.  Screening and counseling for postpartum depression by nurses: the women's views.

Authors:  Lisa S Segre; Michael W O'Hara; Stephan Arndt; Cheryl T Beck
Journal:  MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.412

5.  Women's and care providers' perspectives of quality prenatal care: a qualitative descriptive study.

Authors:  Wendy Sword; Maureen I Heaman; Sandy Brooks; Suzanne Tough; Patricia A Janssen; David Young; Dawn Kingston; Michael E Helewa; Noori Akhtar-Danesh; Eileen Hutton
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Pregnant Women's Perceptions of Harms and Benefits of Mental Health Screening.

Authors:  Dawn Kingston; Marie-Paule Austin; Sheila W McDonald; Lydia Vermeyden; Maureen Heaman; Kathleen Hegadoren; Gerri Lasiuk; Joshua Kingston; Wendy Sword; Karly Jarema; Sander Veldhuyzen van Zanten; Sarah D McDonald; Anne Biringer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Comparing the feasibility, acceptability, clinical-, and cost-effectiveness of mental health e-screening to paper-based screening on the detection of depression, anxiety, and psychosocial risk in pregnant women: a study protocol of a randomized, parallel-group, superiority trial.

Authors:  Dawn Kingston; Sheila McDonald; Anne Biringer; Marie-Paule Austin; Kathy Hegadoren; Sarah McDonald; Rebecca Giallo; Arto Ohinmaa; Gerri Lasiuk; Glenda MacQueen; Wendy Sword; Marie Lane-Smith; Sander Veldhuyzen van Zanten
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Digging over that old ground: an Australian perspective of women's experience of psychosocial assessment and depression screening in pregnancy and following birth.

Authors:  Mellanie Rollans; Virginia Schmied; Lynn Kemp; Tanya Meade
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 2.809

9.  Obstetric and psychosocial risk factors for Australian-born and non-Australian born women and associated pregnancy and birth outcomes: a population based cohort study.

Authors:  Hannah Grace Dahlen; Bryanne Barnett; Jane Kohlhoff; Maya Elizabeth Drum; Ana Maria Munoz; Charlene Thornton
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Study protocol for a randomized, controlled, superiority trial comparing the clinical and cost- effectiveness of integrated online mental health assessment-referral-care in pregnancy to usual prenatal care on prenatal and postnatal mental health and infant health and development: the Integrated Maternal Psychosocial Assessment to Care Trial (IMPACT).

Authors:  Dawn Kingston; Marie-Paule Austin; Kathy Hegadoren; Sheila McDonald; Gerri Lasiuk; Sarah McDonald; Maureen Heaman; Anne Biringer; Wendy Sword; Rebecca Giallo; Tejal Patel; Marie Lane-Smith; Sander Veldhuyzen van Zanten
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.