Literature DB >> 15914645

Improving the design of the letter contrast sensitivity test.

Aries Arditi1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a small-format letter contrast sensitivity test with improved accuracy, suitable for portable use and near testing, and having a simple and unambiguous scoring system that can be used with reference to existing norms.
METHODS: A near test, printed on resin-coated paper and mounted on plastic was developed by using Sloan letters, with 0.04 log unit contrast decrements between each letter and a simple scoring procedure. Monte Carlo methods and a Weibull function model of visual performance were used to assess test accuracy.
RESULTS: The new test has 28% lower score standard deviations than the Pelli-Robson Contrast Sensitivity Chart, over a wide range of low misreporting rates, while maintaining test scores that differ from the Pelli-Robson by 0.01 log unit, permitting use of norms collected with the Pelli-Robson test.
CONCLUSIONS: While maintaining comparability with Pelli-Robson norms, the new test has improved accuracy in comparison with the Pelli-Robson chart and several other advantages that result from its smaller size.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15914645     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.04-1198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  57 in total

1.  Effect of yellow filter on visual acuity and contrast sensitivity under glare condition among different age groups.

Authors:  Monireh Mahjoob; Samira Heydarian; Somayyeh Koochi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Lapse resistance in the verbal letter reporting task.

Authors:  Aries Arditi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07-25       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 3.  Clinical assessment of two new contrast sensitivity charts.

Authors:  Kavitha Thayaparan; Michael D Crossland; Gary S Rubin
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Can we improve clinical prediction of at-risk older drivers?

Authors:  Alex R Bowers; R Julius Anastasio; Sarah S Sheldon; Margaret G O'Connor; Ann M Hollis; Piers D Howe; Todd S Horowitz
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2013-07-16

5.  Marked dissociation of photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity even in normal observers.

Authors:  Hannah Hertenstein; Michael Bach; Nikolai Johannes Gross; Flemming Beisse
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Blur Adaptation to Central Retinal Disease.

Authors:  Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz; Russell L Woods; Eli Peli
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Driving with central field loss I: effect of central scotomas on responses to hazards.

Authors:  P Matthew Bronstad; Alex R Bowers; Amanda Albu; Robert Goldstein; Eli Peli
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 7.389

8.  Use of prescribed optical devices in age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Dawn K Decarlo; Gerald McGwin; Karen Searcey; Liyan Gao; Marsha Snow; Lynne Stevens; Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Contrast sensitivity with bifocal intraocular lenses is halved, as measured with the Freiburg Vision Test (FrACT), yet patients are happy.

Authors:  Alexandra Anton; Daniel Böhringer; Michael Bach; Thomas Reinhard; Florian Birnbaum
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 10.  The Assessment of Visual Function and Functional Vision.

Authors:  Christopher R Bennett; Peter J Bex; Corinna M Bauer; Lotfi B Merabet
Journal:  Semin Pediatr Neurol       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 1.636

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.