Literature DB >> 15914603

Self-reported dry eye disease across refractive modalities.

Jason J Nichols1, Corrie Ziegler, G Lynn Mitchell, Kelly K Nichols.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare self-reported dry eye disease across contact lens wearers, spectacles wearers, and clinical emmetropes (i.e., those not requiring refractive correction).
METHODS: The survey included two symptom questions (dryness and light sensitivity) that inquired about frequency and intensity at three times of day (morning, afternoon, and evening) and a self-perception question (i.e., Do you think you have dry eyes?). Dryness and light sensitivity scales were then calculated, summed, and scored, providing a dry eye classification. Logistic regression (binary and multinomial) and analysis of covariance were used to examine the relation between mode of refractive correction and dry eye status, frequency of symptoms, and diurnal change in symptom intensity.
RESULTS: Overall, 893 surveys were completed, and the age-adjusted frequency of dry eye in the sample was 28.7%, with 3.5% of the sample reporting severe symptoms (at least grade 4 of a possible 5 for both symptoms). Contact lens wearers were most likely to report dry eye disease (52.3%), followed by spectacle wearers (23.9%) and clinical emmetropes (7.1%). Adjustment for age and gender showed that contact lens (adjusted odds ratio = 12.37, 95% confidence interval = 7.55-20.26) and spectacle wearers (adjusted odds ratio = 2.06, 95% confidence interval = 1.12-3.80) were more likely than emmetropes to report dry eye problems. After adjustment for age and gender, contact lens wearers were shown to be more likely to experience frequent symptoms and an increase in symptoms throughout the day (F = 51.4, P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of self-reported dry eye is high, especially in contact lens wearers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15914603     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.04-1294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  21 in total

1.  [Contact lenses from the perspective of ophthalmologists].

Authors:  R Khaireddin
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the subcommittee on the epidemiology of, and associated risk factors for, MGD.

Authors:  Debra A Schaumberg; Jason J Nichols; Eric B Papas; Louis Tong; Miki Uchino; Kelly K Nichols
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Comparison of the Schirmer I test with and without topical anesthesia for diagnosing dry eye.

Authors:  Na Li; Xin-Guo Deng; Mei-Feng He
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Validity of subjective assessment as screening tool for dry eye disease and its association with clinical tests.

Authors:  Kavita R Bhatnagar; Sonali Pote; Sudeep Pujari; Dhiraj Deka
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Tear film, contact lens, and patient factors associated with corneal staining.

Authors:  Jason J Nichols; Loraine T Sinnott
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 6.  Dry eye disease and microbial keratitis: is there a connection?

Authors:  Srihari Narayanan; Rachel L Redfern; William L Miller; Kelly K Nichols; Alison M McDermott
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 5.033

7.  Treatment, material, care, and patient-related factors in contact lens-related dry eye.

Authors:  Padmapriya Ramamoorthy; Loraine T Sinnott; Jason J Nichols
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Efficacy of two-month treatment with Xiloial eyedrops for discomfort from disposable soft contact lenses.

Authors:  Piera Versura; Vincenzo Profazio; Nicole Balducci; Emilio C Campos
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-09-20

9.  [Eyelid hygiene for contact lens wearers with blepharitis. Comparative investigation of treatment with baby shampoo versus phospholipid solution].

Authors:  R Khaireddin; A Hueber
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.059

10.  A two-week clinical evaluation of the safety of Systane Ultra in contact lens-wearing patients.

Authors:  David Kading
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-02-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.