Literature DB >> 15914304

Deciding the cause of death after autopsy--revisited.

Michael S Pollanen1.   

Abstract

One of the most difficult tasks in forensic medicine is deciding the cause of death in an unclear or debatable case. Most decision-making difficulties arise when there is a definite or potential causal interaction between: disease, injury, and circumstantial events. Sometimes these interactions are trivial, but in many instances the causal interaction is undeniably important, potentially important, or of uncertain relevance. In some cases, the cause of death may be unascertainable despite best efforts, and the pathologist must resist attempts at a presumptive, but objectively un-substantiated diagnosis. In general, there are three major categories that lead to difficulties: (i) co-existence of a pre-existing condition and a fatal injury; (ii) competing potential causes of death; (iii) historical events may be causally relevant to death by injury. In this review, these categories are discussed in detail and illustrated with relevant examples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15914304     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcfm.2005.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Forensic Med        ISSN: 1353-1131


  3 in total

1.  Acute hemorrhagic leukoencephalomyelitis in a man with viral myocarditis.

Authors:  Indira D Kitulwatte; Patrick J H Kim; Michael S Pollanen
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.007

2.  Asphyxia homicides in Denmark 1992-2016.

Authors:  Asser H Thomsen; Peter M Leth; Hans Petter Hougen; Palle Villesen
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 2.791

Review 3.  A review of causal inference in forensic medicine.

Authors:  Putri Dianita Ika Meilia; Michael D Freeman; Maurice P Zeegers
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 2.007

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.