Literature DB >> 15913710

Dispersion of As and selected heavy metals around a coal-burning power station in central Slovakia.

T J Keegan1, M E Farago, I Thornton, Bing Hong, R N Colvile, B Pesch, P Jakubis, M J Nieuwenhuijsen.   

Abstract

A power station in central Slovakia emitted arsenic (As) in large quantities for over 30 years as a result of burning As-rich brown coal. Nowadays emissions of As are low. Over the lifetime of the plant's operation over 3000 tonne of As have been emitted into the environment. This paper aims to examine the concentrations of As in the soil around the power station, and also to investigate whether the coal burnt in the plant, and consequently the emissions from it, contained raised levels of six further heavy metals. Soil concentrations were compared to ground level air As concentrations predicted by an air dispersion model. Coal samples were taken from the power station and analysed to determine concentrations of As, Zn, Pb, Cu, Cr, Ni and Cd. Soil samples (n=113) were taken up to 12 km from the plant along a transect designed to follow the valley floor in which the power station is situated. Soil samples were analysed for concentrations of those elements for which coal was tested. Concentrations of As in coal were high (AM 518 mug/g). Those of other heavy metals were, in general, low. Concentrations of soil As were substantially raised in the near vicinity of the plant but decreased within 5 km to concentrations similar to those in the rest of the district. Overall, levels within 10 km of the plant were slightly above those recommended for residential levels in the UK. Soil concentrations of other heavy metals were higher in the vicinity of the plant but none, overall was raised. Comparison of results from a previous air dispersion model of ground level air arsenic concentrations showed a moderate correlation (r=0.6) between modelled and measured values. Over its period of operation the power plant has contributed to raised levels of soil As in the local soils, though not substantially of other elements. Though now airborne As emissions are controlled, concern remains regarding soil arsenic concentrations and fugitive emissions from the plant that could be contributing to exposure of the local population and of the workforce.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 15913710     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.03.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  10 in total

1.  Arsenic mobility and speciation in contaminated kitchen garden and lawn soils: an evaluation of water for assessment of As phytoavailability.

Authors:  Christophe Waterlot; Francis Douay
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Comparison of inorganic and composite ferric oxide sorbents for arsenic removal.

Authors:  Helena Parschová; Petra Slapáková; Alena Uzlová; Ludek Jelínek; Eva Mistová
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  Impairment of soil health due to fly ash-fugitive dust deposition from coal-fired thermal power plants.

Authors:  R Raja; A K Nayak; A K Shukla; K S Rao; Priyanka Gautam; B Lal; R Tripathi; M Shahid; B B Panda; A Kumar; P Bhattacharyya; G Bardhan; S Gupta; D K Patra
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Distribution of potentially harmful elements in soils around a large coal-fired power plant.

Authors:  Flavio Manoel Rodrigues da Silva Júnior; Paula Florêncio Ramires; Marina Dos Santos; Elisa Rosa Seus; Maria Cristina Flores Soares; Ana Luíza Muccillo-Baisch; Nicolai Mirlean; Paulo Roberto Martins Baisch
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 4.609

5.  Heavy metal contaminations in soil-rice system: source identification in relation to a sulfur-rich coal burning power plant in Northern Guangdong Province, China.

Authors:  Xiangqin Wang; Xiaoduo Zeng; Liu Chuanping; Fangbai Li; Xianghua Xu; Yahui Lv
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  The distance-to-source trend in vanadium and arsenic exposures for residents living near a petrochemical complex.

Authors:  Tzu-Hsuen Yuan; Chia-Pin Chio; Ruei-Hao Shie; Wei-Hsu Pien; Chang-Chuan Chan
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 5.563

7.  Assessment of heavy metals in soils and groundwater in an urban watershed of Yaoundé (Cameroon-West Africa).

Authors:  Célestin Defo; Bernard Palmer Kfuban Yerima; Ives Magloire Kengne Noumsi; Nestor Bemmo
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Identification of soil heavy metal sources from anthropogenic activities and pollution assessment of Fuyang County, China.

Authors:  X Y Zhang; F F Lin; Mike T F Wong; X L Feng; K Wang
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 2.513

9.  Apportionment and Spatial Pattern Analysis of Soil Heavy Metal Pollution Sources Related to Industries of Concern in a County in Southwestern China.

Authors:  Xiaohui Chen; Mei Lei; Shiwen Zhang; Degang Zhang; Guanghui Guo; Xiaofeng Zhao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.614

10.  Analysis of Air and Soil Quality around Thermal Power Plants and Coal Mines of Singrauli Region, India.

Authors:  Harsimranjit Kaur Romana; Ramesh P Singh; Chandra S Dubey; Dericks P Shukla
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 4.614

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.