Literature DB >> 15913690

Response of mouse skin to tattooing: use of SKH-1 mice as a surrogate model for human tattooing.

Neera V Gopee1, Yanyan Cui, Greg Olson, Alan R Warbritton, Barbara J Miller, Letha H Couch, Wayne G Wamer, Paul C Howard.   

Abstract

Tattooing is a popular cosmetic practice involving more than 45 million US citizens. Since the toxicology of tattoo inks and pigments used to formulate tattoo inks has not been reported, we studied the immunological impact of tattooing and determined recovery time from this trauma. SKH-1 hairless mice were tattooed using commercial tattoo inks or suspensions of titanium dioxide, cadmium sulfide, or iron oxide, and sacrificed at 0.5, 1, 3, 4, 7, or 14 days post-tattooing. Histological evaluation revealed dermal hemorrhage at 0.5 and 1 day. Acute inflammation and epidermal necrosis were initiated at 0.5 day decreasing in incidence by day 14. Dermal necrosis and epidermal hyperplasia were prominent by day 3, reducing in severity by day 14. Chronic active inflammation persisted in all tattooed mice from day 3 to 14 post-tattooing. Inguinal and axillary lymph nodes were pigmented, the inguinal being most reactive as evidenced by lymphoid hyperplasia and polymorphonuclear infiltration. Cutaneous nuclear protein concentrations of nuclear factor-kappa B were elevated between 0.5 and 4 days. Inflammatory and proliferative biomarkers, cyclooxygenase-1, cyclooxygenase-2, and ornithine decarboxylase protein levels were elevated between 0.5 and 4 days in the skin and decreased to control levels by day 14. Interleukin-1 beta and interleukin-10 were elevated in the lymph nodes but suppressed in the tattooed skin, with maximal suppression occurring between days 0.5 and 4. These data demonstrate that mice substantially recover from the tattooing insult by 14 days, leaving behind pigment in the dermis and the regional lymph nodes. The response seen in mice is similar to acute injury seen in humans, suggesting that the murine model might be a suitable surrogate for investigating the toxicological and phototoxicological properties of ingredients used in tattooing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15913690     DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2005.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol        ISSN: 0041-008X            Impact factor:   4.219


  13 in total

1.  Permanent tattooing has no impact on local sweat rate, sweat sodium concentration and skin temperature or prediction of whole-body sweat sodium concentration during moderate-intensity cycling in a warm environment.

Authors:  Jeff Beliveau; Maxime Perreault-Briere; David Jeker; Thomas A Deshayes; Ana Durán-Suárez; Lindsay B Baker; Eric D B Goulet
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Safety of tattoos and permanent make-up: a regulatory view.

Authors:  Michael Giulbudagian; Ines Schreiver; Ajay Vikram Singh; Peter Laux; Andreas Luch
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 5.153

3.  The effect of early life experience, environment, and genetic factors on spontaneous home-cage aggression-related wounding in male C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Brianna N Gaskill; Aurora M Stottler; Joseph P Garner; Christina W Winnicker; Guy B Mulder; Kathleen R Pritchett-Corning
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 12.625

4.  Cytokines are systemic effectors of lymphatic function in acute inflammation.

Authors:  Melissa B Aldrich; Eva M Sevick-Muraca
Journal:  Cytokine       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.861

5.  Drug delivery by tattooing to treat cutaneous leishmaniasis.

Authors:  Marina Temi Shio; Marilene Paquet; Caroline Martel; Tom Bosschaerts; Stef Stienstra; Martin Olivier; Anny Fortin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Colocalization of cell death with antigen deposition in skin enhances vaccine immunogenicity.

Authors:  Alexandra C I Depelsenaire; Stefano C Meliga; Celia L McNeilly; Frances E Pearson; Jacob W Coffey; Oscar L Haigh; Christopher J Flaim; Ian H Frazer; Mark A F Kendall
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 8.551

7.  Socio-epidemiologic aspects and cutaneous side effects of permanent tattoos in Germany - Tattoos are not restricted to a specific social phenotype.

Authors:  Cornelia Sigrid Lissi Müller; Angela Oertel; Rebecca Körner; Claudia Pföhler; Thomas Vogt
Journal:  Dermatoendocrinol       Date:  2016-12-15

8.  DNA-vaccination via tattooing induces stronger humoral and cellular immune responses than intramuscular delivery supported by molecular adjuvants.

Authors:  Dana Pokorna; Ivonne Rubio; Martin Müller
Journal:  Genet Vaccines Ther       Date:  2008-02-07

9.  Tattoo Delivery of a Semliki Forest Virus-Based Vaccine Encoding Human Papillomavirus E6 and E7.

Authors:  Stephanie van de Wall; Mateusz Walczak; Nienke van Rooij; Baukje-Nynke Hoogeboom; Tjarko Meijerhof; Hans W Nijman; Toos Daemen
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2015-03-24

10.  Synchrotron-based ν-XRF mapping and μ-FTIR microscopy enable to look into the fate and effects of tattoo pigments in human skin.

Authors:  Ines Schreiver; Bernhard Hesse; Christian Seim; Hiram Castillo-Michel; Julie Villanova; Peter Laux; Nadine Dreiack; Randolf Penning; Remi Tucoulou; Marine Cotte; Andreas Luch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.