Literature DB >> 15913583

The U wave in the electrocardiogram: a solution for a 100-year-old riddle.

Henk J Ritsema van Eck1, Jan A Kors, Gerard van Herpen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In the electrocardiogram (ECG) the U wave follows the T, which is considered to reflect the repolarization of the cardiac ventricles. Despite the U wave's well-known clinical relevance, a satisfactory explanation of its origin is still outstanding. We have undertaken to explain the formation of the U wave by means of a simple digital model of the left ventricle.
METHODS: The model employs a multi-layered segment of the myocardium. To each layer an action potential (AP) is assigned with shape and duration according to published data. The potential differences between the APs produce time-varying electrical sources. Each source contributes to the potentials in an arbitrary point P of the body. The strength of this contribution is determined by a specific coefficient, the "lead vector", linking P to the source. The ECG recorded at P is calculated as the sum of all potential contributions.
RESULTS: The repolarization waves constructed in this way reproduce the natural aspects of a T wave followed by a U wave. The creation of a U wave is conditional on small voltage differences between the tail ends of the APs. No fundamental demarcation exists between U wave and preceding T wave. The morphology of the T-U wave is dependent on the geometrical position of P with respect to the myocardium.
CONCLUSION: T and U form a continuum. Together they are the resultant of one and the same process of repolarization of the ventricular myocardium. This has implications for the measurement of QT duration and for safety testing of drug-induced QT prolongation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15913583     DOI: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Res        ISSN: 0008-6363            Impact factor:   10.787


  8 in total

Review 1.  The role of transmural ventricular heterogeneities in cardiac vulnerability to electric shocks.

Authors:  Thushka Maharaj; Robert Blake; Natalia Trayanova; David Gavaghan; Blanca Rodriguez
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 3.667

2.  Methodology of QT-interval measurement in the modular ECG analysis system (MEANS).

Authors:  Jan A Kors; Gerard van Herpen
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 3.  Update on the evaluation of a new drug for effects on cardiac repolarization in humans: issues in early drug development.

Authors:  Vaibhav Salvi; Dilip R Karnad; Gopi Krishna Panicker; Snehal Kothari
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  Diastolic electromechanical coupling: association of the ECG T-peak to T-end interval with echocardiographic markers of diastolic dysfunction.

Authors:  Andrew Sauer; Jane E Wilcox; Adin-Cristian Andrei; Rod Passman; Jeffrey J Goldberger; Sanjiv J Shah
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-03-30

5.  Origin of the electrocardiographic U wave: effects of M cells and dynamic gap junction coupling.

Authors:  Bruce Hopenfeld; Hiroshi Ashikaga
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  The Double U Wave-Should the Electrocardiogram be Interpreted Echocardiographically?

Authors:  James Ker
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2010-09-07

7.  An analysis of the U-wave and its relation to the T-wave in body surface potential maps for healthy subjects and MI patients.

Authors:  Małgorzata Fereniec; Günter Stix; Michał Kania; Tomasz Mroczka; Roman Maniewski
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 1.468

8.  Powerline noise elimination in biomedical signals via blind source separation and wavelet analysis.

Authors:  Samuel Akwei-Sekyere
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 2.984

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.