| Literature DB >> 15913500 |
Richard L Dunbar1, Daniel J Rader.
Abstract
Although circumstantial evidence supports raising high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC) in patients with low levels of HDLC, the scarcity of event-based trials has led to uncertainty with regard to the benefit of high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-raising therapy. Based on the National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines, therapy for dyslipidemia is focused initially on targeting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC), and in patients with hypertriglyceridemia, secondarily on targeting non-HDLC. When HDLC remains low, the decision to target HDLC depends on the assessment of risk of cardiovascular events. We often consider drug therapy specifically to raise HDLC in high-risk patients, such as those with established atherosclerotic vascular disease, type 2 diabetes, or a Framingham risk score of 20% or above. The majority of high-risk patients require drug therapy, usually a statin, to achieve aggressive LDLC and non-HDLC goals, and thus many patients with low HDLC are candidates for statin therapy. However, a second drug is often required to achieve substantial HDL raising. Although no formal goals for HDLC exist, reasonable goals are HDLC greater than 40 mg/dL in men and greater than 50 mg/dL in women. We often add either niacin or a fibrate to a statin in high-risk patients with low HDLC levels. Targeting HDLC with pharmacologic therapy is a more difficult decision in moderate-risk patients, in whom therapy must be highly individualized.Entities:
Year: 2005 PMID: 15913500 DOI: 10.1007/s11936-005-0002-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 1092-8464