Literature DB >> 15912675

Using mixed methods in disability and rehabilitation research.

Thilo Kroll1, Melinda T Neri, Kaye Miller.   

Abstract

This paper will discuss the theoretical design considerations and the practical integration of quantitative and qualitative methods in disability and rehabilitation research, which have gained recent popularity among researchers of various disciplines. Whereas quantitative experimental and survey approaches allow researchers to draw generalizable conclusions that apply to a particular population as a whole, qualitative methods capture the depth of respondents' experiences in their own words. Qualitative methods may be used to explore new topical areas prior to implementing a population-based survey, or they may follow quantitative approaches to explain findings in greater detail. We will discuss research findings from two recent studies of rehabilitation industry professionals and people with physical disabilities to exemplify the utility of mixed-method designs in disability and rehabilitation research. The article will conclude with recommendations for rehabilitation nursing researchers to apply both qualitative and quantitative methods in their research practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15912675     DOI: 10.1002/j.2048-7940.2005.tb00372.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rehabil Nurs        ISSN: 0278-4807            Impact factor:   1.625


  9 in total

1.  Individual interviews and focus groups in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison of two qualitative methods.

Authors:  Michaela Coenen; Tanja A Stamm; Gerold Stucki; Alarcos Cieza
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Developing an Immersive Virtual Reality Training System for Novel Pediatric Power Wheelchair Users: Protocol for a Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Sara Drisdelle; Liam Power; Scott Thieu; Jordan Sheriko
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2022-10-06

3.  A promising method for identifying cross-cultural differences in patient perspective: the use of Internet-based focus groups for content validation of new patient reported outcome assessments.

Authors:  Mark J Atkinson; Jan Lohs; Ilka Kuhagen; Julie Kaufman; Shamsu Bhaidani
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 3.186

4.  A Multidisciplinary Model to Guide Employment Outcomes Among People Living With Spinal Cord Injuries in South Africa: A Mixed Methods Study Protocol.

Authors:  Ntsikelelo Pefile; Joyce Mothabeng; Saloshni Naidoo
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2016-12-06

5.  Environmental factors influencing participation of stroke survivors in a Western Cape setting.

Authors:  Judy Cawood; Surona Visagie
Journal:  Afr J Disabil       Date:  2015-10-30

6.  Is any wheelchair better than no wheelchair? A Zimbabwean perspective.

Authors:  Surona Visagie; Tecla Mlambo; Judith van der Veen; Clement Nhunzvi; Deborah Tigere; Elsje Scheffler
Journal:  Afr J Disabil       Date:  2015-11-20

7.  Impact of structured wheelchair services on satisfaction and function of wheelchair users in Zimbabwe.

Authors:  Surona Visagie; Tecla Mlambo; Judith van der Veen; Clement Nhunzvi; Deborah Tigere; Elsje Scheffler
Journal:  Afr J Disabil       Date:  2016-06-10

8.  Exploring the impact of wheelchair design on user function in a rural South African setting.

Authors:  Surona Visagie; Svenje Duffield; Mariaan Unger
Journal:  Afr J Disabil       Date:  2015-06-26

9.  Methodological Aspects of Focus Groups in Health Research: Results of Qualitative Interviews With Focus Group Moderators.

Authors:  Anja P Tausch; Natalja Menold
Journal:  Glob Qual Nurs Res       Date:  2016-03-14
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.