Literature DB >> 15912188

The Syndrome of Frontonasal Dysplasia, Callosal Agenesis, Basal Encephalocele, and Eye Anomalies - Phenotypic and Aetiological Considerations.

Antonio Richieri-Costa1, Maria Leine Guion-Almeida.   

Abstract

We report ten sporadic cases of Brazilian patients with facial midline defects, callosal agenesis, basal encephalocele, and ocular anomalies. This very rare cluster of anomalies has been well reported before. However, only until recently it is recognized as a syndrome belonging to frontonasal dysplasia spectrum. The ten cases confirm a distinct clinical entity and help to define the phenotype more precisely than previously. Up to now etiology remains unknown, although we conjecture that it is due to a mutation in TGIF gene.

Entities:  

Year:  2004        PMID: 15912188      PMCID: PMC1074508          DOI: 10.7150/ijms.1.34

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Sci        ISSN: 1449-1907            Impact factor:   3.738


1. Introduction

Frontonasal dysplasia (FND) is the hallmark of several syndromes involving the frontonasal process that includes: isolated frontonasal dysplasia (MIM 136760 and 305645), acrofrontofacionasal dysostosis 1 (MIM 201180), acrofrontofacionasal dysostosis 2 (MIM 201181), frontofacionasal dysplasia (MIM 229400), oculoauriculofrontonasal syndrome (MIM 601452), among other related conditions 1. One of the syndromes within this spectrum comprises of the syndrome of midline facial defects, callosal agenesis, basal encephaloceles, and eye anomalies. It has been described under different eponyms, most commonly the morning glory syndrome. The anomalies observed in the present condition are embryological related, occurring in the same critical period of time, most likely during the early induction of the forebrain, resulting in anomalies involving frontonasal process, midfacial structures as well as the primordium of the eyes. Several genes are known to exert effects during this period resulting in different craniofacial anomalies 2. Up to now there is no evidence of any particular gene involved in etiology of any reported condition within the FND spectrum. One of the patients here described was previously evaluated within a sample of patients purportedly presenting holoprosencephaly (HPE) 3 and showed a 485C→T mutation in exon 4 of the TGIF gene. We would like to suggest that the syndrome here reported could be related to mutation in this gene.

2. Clinical Report

We evaluated ten patients with FND, callosal agenesis, basal encephalocele, and eye anomalies syndrome ascertained through the Serviço de Genética Clínica do Hospital de Reabilitação de Anomalias Craniofaciais da Universidade de São Paulo-Bauru-SP, Brasil. All index cases were isolated with no recurrence in relatives. There were no antecedents of neural tube defect in the families. There was no parental consanguinity. The sex ratio of the sample was 1:1. Age ranged from 5 months to 15 years. Parental age was within the population average. Family history was obtained by personal interview. Pregnancy history and delivery were unremarkable. There was no reference to toxic, infectious, or teratogenic agents during the pregnancy. Clinical, laboratorial, and radiological data are presented in Table 1. Photographic documentation is shown in the back of paper.
Table 1

Clinical findings of studied cases

Patient Sex Age Cleft Ocular Anomalies CNS Anomalies Additional data Laboratorial
1 M 6 y Midline CLP Right palpebral ptosis and cataract Sphenoethmoidal encephaloc ele ACC Normal development Short stature 46,XY TGIF gene mutation
2 M 11 y Midline CL Cleft uvula Left palpebral ptosis, microcornea, and optic nerve atrophy Sphenoethmoidal encephalocele ACC Normal development Short stature Right choanal atresia 46,XY
3 F 9 y Midline CL Bifid nasal tip Right palpebral ptosis, microphthalmia, convergernt strabismus, and cataract Sphenoethmoidal encephalocele ACC Normal development 46,XX
4 F 15 y Midline CLP Bilateral palpebral ptosis Sphenoethmoidal encephalocele ACC Normal development 46,XX
5 M 13 y Midline CLP Left palpebral ptosis,optic bulb atrophy, and cataract Right papillary coloboma Sphenoethmoidal encephalocele ACC Normal development Short stature 46,XY
6 F 7 y Midline CL Left palpebral ptosis Sphenoethmoidal encephalocele ACC Normal development Short stature 46,XX,r(21)
7 M 1 y 2 m Midline CL miopia Sphenoethmoidal encephalocele ACC Mild developmental delay Growth retardation Nocturnal apnea 46,XY
8 F 2 y 2m Midline CL Bifid nasal tip Ptosis Sphenoethmoidal encephalocele ACC Normal development 46,XX,9ph
9 F 7 m Midline CL Right globe<left globe Left peripupilar iris atrophy, posterior polar cataract, optic nerve coloboma Ethmoidal encephlalocele ACC Normal development Growth retardation 46,XX
10 M 5 m Midline CLP CP Ptosis Callosal agenesis Nomal development Growth retardation 46,XY

Legend: F: female; M: male; y: years; m: months; CL: cleft lip; CP: cleft palate; CLP: cleft lip and palate; ACC: corpus callosum agenesis

3. Discussion

Midline craniofacial and central nervous system anomalies are commonly associated with eye anomalies 4; 5; 6; 7; 8; 9. Callosal agenesis, basal encephaloceles, FND, and ocular anomalies may be manifested as isolated anomalies or in different combination as part of the clinical picture of some dozen of syndromes, however, this unique association represents a well-defined syndrome within the FND spectrum. In relation to this one, up to now, there are no objective correlations toward a definitive etiological agent nor definitive delineation of the phenotype since different conditions have been named within this spectrum 10; 11; 12; 13; 14. Taking into account the above considerations, as well as the present casuistic and the number of reviewed papers, the clinical delineation of the present condition can be established as follow: callosal agenesis, basal encephloceles, mainly sphenoethmoidal type, always present. Facial and ocular anomalies are variable. The former ranges from mild hypertelorism with a median upper lip notch to median cleft involving the lip and the nose, and the later includes findings such as ptosis, orbital asymmetry, strabismus, optic disc anomalies. Morning glory anomaly, despite often referred, is not an obligatory finding. It represents an isolated ocular sign rather than a syndrome, resulting from a congenital optic disc dysplasia occurring isolated or within the clinical spectrum of some sporadic mendelian, and chromosomal syndromes 14; 15; 16; 17; 18; 19. It is remarkable that in spite of central nervous system damage, mental status is usually normal, and only occasionally learning disabilities, behavioral and/or language problems can present 20. Image studies reveal in all cases basal encephalocele, agenesis of the corpus callosum, and well-preserved cerebral structures and anterior commissures. The extension of the basal celes is variable, and in some instances respiratory distress can be present 21. It is evident that the manifested phenotype results from one hit event occurring before the 8 weeks gestation since: the nerve fibers of retinal ganglion cells begin to project into the CNS at 8-10 wk 2; 22; early callosal axon guidance towards its specific target starts at 9-12 wk 23; 24; encephaloceles arises as earlier as at 4th to 5th post conceptual weeks 25 coincidental with the development of the frontonasal process 26. Several genes exert effects early in embryogenesis resulting in malformation of a specific structure or different related ones depending on the developmental context. Considering midline craniofacial development, in known syndromes, most important involved genes are the SHH, TGIF, GLI2, TBX22, ZIC2, SIX3, TDGF1, among others 27; 28; 29; 30; 31; 32. TGIF mutations in humans affect brain development resulting in different pattern of cerebral and facial manifestations ranging from normality to typical HPE phenotype. Penetrance is relatively low. Patient 1 of the present study was previously reported as having HPE 3, however, reviewing our files we collected the present sample and we conclude that he presents this particular syndrome instead HPE. It is possible that the phenotypic difference existing between these conditions could be attributed to different mutations within the gene and that the 485C-T mutation in exon 4 of the TGIF gene, detected in Patient 1, could be responsible for the particular phenotype here reported. Presently we are conducting molecular studies in order to test this hypothesis. In conclusion, the condition reported here is clinically homogeneous, and phenotypically it can be defined as frontonasal dysplasia, callosal agenesis, basal encephalocele and ocular anomalies. Some related phenotypes should be considered in different diagnosis but excluded as main diagnosis 12 (patients 2 and 4); 11. In view of this data we would like to suggest that the FND, callosal agenesis, basal encephalocele, and eye anomalies syndrome is due to mutation of the TGIF gene.
  30 in total

Review 1.  Induction of the neural crest: a multigene process.

Authors:  Anne K Knecht; Marianne Bronner-Fraser
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Morning glory syndrome and basal encephalocele.

Authors:  Celia S Chen; David David; Ahmed Hanieh
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2003-12-23       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Aniridia, atypical iris defects, optic pit and the morning glory disc anomaly in a family.

Authors:  E I Traboulsi; F Jurdi-Nuwayhid; N S Torbey; G T Frangieh
Journal:  Ophthalmic Paediatr Genet       Date:  1986-08

Review 4.  Congenital abnormalities of body patterning: embryology revisited.

Authors:  Frances R Goodman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-08-23       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Dysgenesis of the corpus callosum and associated telencephalic anomalies: MRI.

Authors:  H Utsunomiya; T Ogasawara; T Hayashi; T Hashimoto; M Okazaki
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Morning glory disc anomaly in neurofibromatosis type 2.

Authors:  M C Brodsky; K Landau; R S Wilson; E Boltshauser
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-06

Review 7.  Midline craniofacial defects and morning glory disc anomaly. A distinct clinical entity.

Authors:  R J Leitch; R M Winter
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl       Date:  1996

Review 8.  Molecular mechanisms of holoprosencephaly.

Authors:  D E Wallis; M Muenke
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.797

Review 9.  Frontonasal dysplasia with optic disc anomalies and other midline craniofacial defects: a report of six cases.

Authors:  M M Lees; P Hodgkins; W Reardon; D Taylor; R Stanhope; B Jones; R Hayward; A D Hockley; M Baraitser; R M Winter
Journal:  Clin Dysmorphol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 0.816

Review 10.  New syndrome with the Sakoda complex, bilateral anophthalmia, and cortical dysgenesis.

Authors:  H Ehara; A Kurimasa; K Ohno; K Takeshita
Journal:  Pediatr Neurol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.372

View more
  4 in total

1.  Septo-optic Dysplasia Complex with Omphalocele, Pre-maxillary Agenesis and Encephalocele.

Authors:  Abdul Majeed Kavarodi; Khalid Zharani; El-Sayed Ali; Hussain Sharahili
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2014-08-03

2.  Prenatal evaluation of the Sakoda complex.

Authors:  Usha D Nagaraj; Rohitha Moudgal; Robert J Hopkin; Charu Venkatesan; Beth M Kline-Fath
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-08-05

3.  Frontonasal dysplasia (Median cleft face syndrome).

Authors:  Seema Sharma; Vipin Sharma; Meenakshi Bothra
Journal:  J Neurosci Rural Pract       Date:  2012-01

Review 4.  Cephalic/cardiac neural crest cell and moyamoya disease.

Authors:  Takahiro Ota; Masaki Komiyama
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2021-06-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.