Ann E Kurth1, King K Holmes, Renee Hawkins, Matthew R Golden. 1. Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Systems, University of Washington (UW) School of Nursing, Seattle, Washington 98195-7266, USA. akurth@u.washington.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Optimal elements of a sexual history for sexually transmitted infection (STI) and HIV risk assessment remain undefined. GOAL: The goal of this study was to describe sexual histories in use at STI clinics across the United States. STUDY: This study consisted of a cross-sectional survey of facilities in cities with populations >200,000 (n = 65). Within each city, a public health STI clinic (71% of the sample) or other STI care facility (29%) was randomly selected and sexual history forms were requested. Information was obtained from 48 clinics (74% response). RESULTS: Most forms recorded information on symptoms and prior STI (96%), condom use (88%), other contraception (85%), and numbers and gender (83%) of sex partners. Common HIV risk questions were injecting drug use (IDU; 94%), sex for drugs or money (58%), and sex with an HIV-positive or IDU partner (52%). Ascertainment of time during which risks occurred (contact periods) varied from the past 14 days to the past 12 months, with only 38% of clinics using any 1 time period. Few histories (17%) incorporated questions for men who have sex with men (MSM). Only 2 (4%) had space to record information about sexual behaviors by the HIV status of the sex partner. Condom use was infrequently assessed specifically for vaginal and anal sex (13%), and condom use problems were rarely explored (10%). Most forms documented STI/HIV counseling, although few (25%) included specific risk reduction plans. CONCLUSIONS: Sexual histories are highly variable. Although challenging to accomplish, STI/HIV care, surveillance, and prevention may be improved by developing consensus on core questions to be used in sexual histories.
BACKGROUND: Optimal elements of a sexual history for sexually transmitted infection (STI) and HIV risk assessment remain undefined. GOAL: The goal of this study was to describe sexual histories in use at STI clinics across the United States. STUDY: This study consisted of a cross-sectional survey of facilities in cities with populations >200,000 (n = 65). Within each city, a public health STI clinic (71% of the sample) or other STI care facility (29%) was randomly selected and sexual history forms were requested. Information was obtained from 48 clinics (74% response). RESULTS: Most forms recorded information on symptoms and prior STI (96%), condom use (88%), other contraception (85%), and numbers and gender (83%) of sex partners. Common HIV risk questions were injecting drug use (IDU; 94%), sex for drugs or money (58%), and sex with an HIV-positive or IDU partner (52%). Ascertainment of time during which risks occurred (contact periods) varied from the past 14 days to the past 12 months, with only 38% of clinics using any 1 time period. Few histories (17%) incorporated questions for men who have sex with men (MSM). Only 2 (4%) had space to record information about sexual behaviors by the HIV status of the sex partner. Condom use was infrequently assessed specifically for vaginal and anal sex (13%), and condom use problems were rarely explored (10%). Most forms documented STI/HIV counseling, although few (25%) included specific risk reduction plans. CONCLUSIONS: Sexual histories are highly variable. Although challenging to accomplish, STI/HIV care, surveillance, and prevention may be improved by developing consensus on core questions to be used in sexual histories.
Authors: Yzette Lanier; Ted Castellanos; Roxanne Y Barrow; Wilbert C Jordan; Virginia Caine; Madeline Y Sutton Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2014-02-24 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Christopher B Hurt; Derrick D Matthews; Molly S Calabria; Kelly A Green; Adaora A Adimora; Carol E Golin; Lisa B Hightow-Weidman Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 3.731