OBJECTIVE: Mental or emotional stress-induced ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death are thought to be mediated by the autonomic nervous system and ischemia. In the absence of ischemia, increased inhomogeneity of repolarization is thought to be important. We tested the hypotheses that in the absence of ischemia, mental stress may modulate repolarization by changing autonomic balance; and mental relaxation induced by hypnosis may offset the potentially adverse effects of stress on the cardiac electrophysiology. METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers (6 male, age 18-35, mean 25 years) experienced a series of different emotions intended to induce a wide range of autonomic response (42 test epochs) on two separate occasions, with and without hypnosis, with continuous electrocardiogram recording. Low- (LF) and HF (high-frequency) heart rate variability was measured and ventricular repolarization was assessed using the relative T-wave residua (proportion of nondipolar components of the T wave) calculated for the T-onset - T peak (TWR-peak T), T peak -T end (TWR-end T), and the whole T wave (TWR). RESULTS: Emotionally induced changes in LF and LF/HF ratio correlated with changes in TWR, e.g., (R = 0.51, p < .001; R = 0.59, p < .0001; and R = 0.59, p < .0003, for LF/HF versus TWR, TWR-Peak T, and TWR-end T, respectively. Mental relaxation induced by hypnosis increased LF power (1,205 ms2) versus 624 ms2, p < .003 for hypnotized versus nonhypnotized state), HF power (1,619 ms2 versus 572 ms2), p < .0004), and reduced LF/HF ratio (1.0 versus 1.5, p = .052) and was associated with a marked reduction in the changes in repolarization in response to emotion, e.g., 10.7 x 10(-6) versus 5.0 x10(-6), p < .03 for TWR. CONCLUSIONS: a) Mental stress in the absence of ischemia altered repolarization inhomogeneity via change in the autonomic balance. b) Mental relaxation induced by hypnosis greatly reduced the effect of mental stress on repolarization. c) These findings may have implications for arrhythmogenesis.
OBJECTIVE: Mental or emotional stress-induced ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death are thought to be mediated by the autonomic nervous system and ischemia. In the absence of ischemia, increased inhomogeneity of repolarization is thought to be important. We tested the hypotheses that in the absence of ischemia, mental stress may modulate repolarization by changing autonomic balance; and mental relaxation induced by hypnosis may offset the potentially adverse effects of stress on the cardiac electrophysiology. METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers (6 male, age 18-35, mean 25 years) experienced a series of different emotions intended to induce a wide range of autonomic response (42 test epochs) on two separate occasions, with and without hypnosis, with continuous electrocardiogram recording. Low- (LF) and HF (high-frequency) heart rate variability was measured and ventricular repolarization was assessed using the relative T-wave residua (proportion of nondipolar components of the T wave) calculated for the T-onset - T peak (TWR-peak T), T peak -T end (TWR-end T), and the whole T wave (TWR). RESULTS: Emotionally induced changes in LF and LF/HF ratio correlated with changes in TWR, e.g., (R = 0.51, p < .001; R = 0.59, p < .0001; and R = 0.59, p < .0003, for LF/HF versus TWR, TWR-Peak T, and TWR-end T, respectively. Mental relaxation induced by hypnosis increased LF power (1,205 ms2) versus 624 ms2, p < .003 for hypnotized versus nonhypnotized state), HF power (1,619 ms2 versus 572 ms2), p < .0004), and reduced LF/HF ratio (1.0 versus 1.5, p = .052) and was associated with a marked reduction in the changes in repolarization in response to emotion, e.g., 10.7 x 10(-6) versus 5.0 x10(-6), p < .03 for TWR. CONCLUSIONS: a) Mental stress in the absence of ischemia altered repolarization inhomogeneity via change in the autonomic balance. b) Mental relaxation induced by hypnosis greatly reduced the effect of mental stress on repolarization. c) These findings may have implications for arrhythmogenesis.
Authors: Mustafa Hassan; April Mela; Qin Li; Babette Brumback; Roger B Fillingim; Jamie B Conti; David S Sheps Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: Marcus A Gray; Peter Taggart; Peter M Sutton; David Groves; Diana R Holdright; David Bradbury; David Brull; Hugo D Critchley Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-04-09 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Paul Enck; Jochen Hefner; Beate M Herbert; Nazar Mazurak; Katja Weimer; Eric R Muth; Stephan Zipfel; Ute Martens Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-12-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Nicholas Child; Ben Hanson; Martin Bishop; Christopher A Rinaldi; Julian Bostock; David Western; Michael Cooklin; Mark O'Neil; Matthew Wright; Reza Razavi; Jaswinder Gill; Peter Taggart Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2014-05-15