Literature DB >> 15911472

Sample sizes for clinical trials with time-to-event endpoints and competing risks.

Gabi Schulgen1, Manfred Olschewski, Vera Krane, Christoph Wanner, Günther Ruf, Martin Schumacher.   

Abstract

We consider clinical trials where the time to occurrence of events in the presence of competing risks is the primary endpoint for treatment evaluation. The number of events with regard to the defined primary endpoint required to ensure the specified power can be calculated according to Schoenfeld's formula like in classical survival studies. However, determination of the number of patients that have to be recruited to observe the calculated number of events requires specification of the length of the accrual period, the trial duration and assumptions about the event-specific hazard functions. Information from previous studies about expected failure rates for the reference treatment is useful and can be translated into assumptions about the appropriate model parameters. A formula for sample size computation is presented for two competing outcome states. Nomograms help to communicate different alternatives of duration and size of the trial to interdisciplinary committees whose members plan and monitor the clinical trial. The 4D trial (Die Deutsche Diabetes Dialyse Studie) designed to compare lipid lowering treatment with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor atorvastatin with placebo in type 2 diabetic patients on hemodialysis with respect to time to the composite event "cardiovascular death or non-fatal myocardial infarction" is used as an example to outline the statistical methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15911472     DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2005.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  11 in total

1.  Rosuvastatin in diabetic hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Hallvard Holdaas; Ingar Holme; Roland E Schmieder; Alan G Jardine; Faiez Zannad; Gudrun E Norby; Bengt C Fellström
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  Design and testing for clinical trials faced with misclassified causes of death.

Authors:  Bart Van Rompaye; Els Goetghebeur; Shabbar Jaffar
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 3.  Statistical Considerations for Analyses of Time-To-Event Endpoints in Oncology Clinical Trials: Illustrations with CAR-T Immunotherapy Studies.

Authors:  Yimei Li; Wei-Ting Hwang; Shannon L Maude; David T Teachey; Noelle V Frey; Regina M Myers; Allison Barz Leahy; Hongyan Liu; David L Porter; Stephan A Grupp; Pamela A Shaw
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 13.801

4.  The use of group sequential designs with common competing risks tests.

Authors:  Brent R Logan; Mei-Jie Zhang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Initially fewer bloodstream infections for allogeneic vs. autologous stem-cell transplants in neutropenic patients.

Authors:  S Hieke; H Bertz; M Dettenkofer; M Schumacher; J Beyersmann
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 4.434

6.  Analysis and design of randomised clinical trials involving competing risks endpoints.

Authors:  Bee-Choo Tai; Joseph Wee; David Machin
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Understanding competing risks: a simulation point of view.

Authors:  Arthur Allignol; Martin Schumacher; Christoph Wanner; Christiane Drechsler; Jan Beyersmann
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Sample size determination for jointly testing a cause-specific hazard and the all-cause hazard in the presence of competing risks.

Authors:  Qing Yang; Wing K Fung; Gang Li
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Design aspects of COVID-19 treatment trials: Improving probability and time of favorable events.

Authors:  Jan Beyersmann; Tim Friede; Claudia Schmoor
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 1.715

10.  The CXCL Family Contributes to Immunosuppressive Microenvironment in Gliomas and Assists in Gliomas Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Zeyu Wang; Yuze Liu; Yuyao Mo; Hao Zhang; Ziyu Dai; Xun Zhang; Weijie Ye; Hui Cao; Zhixiong Liu; Quan Cheng
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.