Literature DB >> 15911471

Practical applications of usability theory to electronic data collection for clinical trials.

Jordana K Schmier1, David W Kane, Michael T Halpern.   

Abstract

Pharmaceutical and device companies are more frequently considering and using electronic data collection (EDC) to collect patient-reported outcomes such as satisfaction and quality of life for clinical trials. The transition from paper-and-pencil data collection to EDC is not without risks. The unique context of clinical trials presents challenges that, if not addressed, can lead to expensive mistakes. The advantages inherent to EDC can easily be cancelled out without careful attention to the characteristics of the clinical setting. This paper provides an overview of EDC issues specific to clinical trials and health care settings. In particular, it evaluates usability issues associated with methods of EDC and suggests strategies to minimize potential problems. Lessons learned from usability testing in the unique setting of the clinical trial can be applied to other projects to decrease costs, enhance the quality of the data, and minimize time to analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15911471     DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2005.01.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  6 in total

1.  How I do it: a practical database management system to assist clinical research teams with data collection, organization, and reporting.

Authors:  Howard Lee; Julius Chapiro; Rüdiger Schernthaner; Rafael Duran; Zhijun Wang; Boris Gorodetski; Jean-François Geschwind; MingDe Lin
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Handheld vs. laptop computers for electronic data collection in clinical research: a crossover randomized trial.

Authors:  Guy Haller; Dagmar M Haller; Delphine S Courvoisier; Christian Lovis
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  An automated standardized system for managing adverse events in clinical research networks.

Authors:  Rachel L Richesson; Jamie F Malloy; Kathleen Paulus; David Cuthbertson; Jeffrey P Krischer
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Operationalization of the UFuRT methodology for usability analysis in the clinical research data management domain.

Authors:  Meredith Nahm; Jiajie Zhang
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 6.317

5.  Use of electronic medical records in oncology outcomes research.

Authors:  Gena Kanas; Libby Morimoto; Fionna Mowat; Cynthia O'Malley; Jon Fryzek; Robert Nordyke
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2010-02-24

6.  Automated inter-rater reliability assessment and electronic data collection in a multi-center breast cancer study.

Authors:  Soe Soe Thwin; Kerri M Clough-Gorr; Maribet C McCarty; Timothy L Lash; Sharon H Alford; Diana S M Buist; Shelley M Enger; Terry S Field; Floyd Frost; Feifei Wei; Rebecca A Silliman
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 4.615

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.