Literature DB >> 15911434

Sensitivity of diagnostic tests for influenza varies with the circulating strains.

Adriana Weinberg1, Christie J Mettenbrink, Dan Ye, Chin-Fen Yang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Effective strategies to combat the spread of influenza viruses rely on accurate diagnosis of the infection, which is greatly affected by the sensitivity of the assays used.
OBJECTIVES: To determine if the sensitivity of assays used to detect influenza varies with the viral strains. STUDY
DESIGN: This prospective study used 142 respiratory specimens submitted to the clinical virology laboratory during the 2003/2004 influenza season, when the H3N2 Fujian strain was first detected in our community, to assess sensitivities of rapid immunoassay (RIA), shell-vial (SV), hemadsorption (HA)-, and fluorescent antibody (FA)-based conventional tissue culture (TC). Results were compared with similar evaluations performed in 2002/2003 or earlier seasons.
RESULTS: Sensitivities of RIA, SV, HA-TC, and FA-TC were 44, 70, 82, and 100%, respectively for influenza virus circulating in 2003/2004. The comparison with results obtained in previous influenza seasons showed a significantly decreased sensitivity of HA-TC (p=0.02) and lower sensitivity of RIA but without reaching statistical significance (44% versus 72%, p=0.2).
CONCLUSIONS: This report underscores the importance of determining the accuracy and sensitivity of diagnostic tests against emerging influenza variant strains.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15911434     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2004.12.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Virol        ISSN: 1386-6532            Impact factor:   3.168


  5 in total

1.  Surveillance of equine respiratory viruses in Ontario.

Authors:  Andrés Diaz-Mendez; Laurent Viel; Joanne Hewson; Paul Doig; Susy Carman; Thomas Chambers; Ashish Tiwari; Catherine Dewey
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.310

2.  Laboratory-based assessment of influenza in German ambulant patients from 1998 to 2008.

Authors:  E Terletskaia-Ladwig; M Eggers; S Meier; M Leinmüller; F Schneider; M Schmid; M Enders
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 3.553

3.  A composite epidemic curve for seasonal influenza in Canada with an international comparison.

Authors:  Dena L Schanzer; Joanne M Langley; Trevor Dummer; Cecile Viboud; Theresa W S Tam
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.380

4.  Estimating sensitivity of laboratory testing for influenza in Canada through modelling.

Authors:  Dena L Schanzer; Michael J Garner; Todd F Hatchette; Joanne M Langley; Samina Aziz; Theresa W S Tam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Role of influenza and other respiratory viruses in admissions of adults to Canadian hospitals.

Authors:  Dena L Schanzer; Joanne M Langley; Theresa W S Tam
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.380

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.