Literature DB >> 15911205

Total joint arthroplasties: current concepts of patient outcomes after surgery.

C Allyson Jones1, Lauren A Beaupre, D W C Johnston, Maria E Suarez-Almazor.   

Abstract

Total hip and knee arthroplasties are effective surgical interventions for relieving pain and improving physical function caused by arthritis. Although the majority of patients substantially improve, not all reports gains or are satisfied after receiving a total joint arthroplasty. This article reviews the literature on patient outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasties for osteoarthritis and the evidence pertaining to factors that affect these patient-centered outcomes. Mounting evidence suggests that no one patient-related or peri-operative factor clearly predicts the amount of pain relief or functional improvement that will occur following total hip or knee arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15911205     DOI: 10.1016/j.cger.2005.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med        ISSN: 0749-0690            Impact factor:   3.076


  25 in total

1.  Comparing the validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L to the Oxford hip and knee scores and SF-12 in osteoarthritis patients 1 year following total joint replacement.

Authors:  Barbara L Conner-Spady; Deborah A Marshall; Eric Bohm; Michael J Dunbar; Tom W Noseworthy
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: functional outcome after total knee replacement varies with patient attributes.

Authors:  Patricia D Franklin; Wenjun Li; David C Ayers
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Responsiveness of the Harris Hip Score and the SF-36: five years after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hon-Yi Shi; Lih-Wen Mau; Je-Ken Chang; Jun-Wen Wang; Herng-Chia Chiu
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Periprosthetic joint infection: the incidence, timing, and predisposing factors.

Authors:  Luis Pulido; Elie Ghanem; Ashish Joshi; James J Purtill; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Prospective study on antimicrobial prophylaxis in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Takahito Yuasa; Jun Yamakawa; Katsuhiko Maezawa; Kazuo Kaneko
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-09-21

Review 6.  Systemic and local toxicity of metal debris released from hip prostheses: A review of experimental approaches.

Authors:  Divya Rani Bijukumar; Abhijith Segu; Júlio C M Souza; XueJun Li; Mark Barba; Louis G Mercuri; Joshua J Jacobs; Mathew Thoppil Mathew
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 5.307

7.  Differential toxicity of processed and non-processed states of CoCrMo degradation products generated from a hip simulator on neural cells.

Authors:  Divya Rani Bijukumar; Abhijith Segu; YongChao Mou; Reza Ghodsi; Tolou Shokufhar; Mark Barba; Xue-Jun Li; Mathew Thoppil Mathew
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 5.913

8.  Effects of clinical pathways in the joint replacement: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  A Barbieri; K Vanhaecht; P Van Herck; W Sermeus; F Faggiano; S Marchisio; M Panella
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 8.775

9.  Determinants of pain, functional limitations and health-related quality of life six months after total knee arthroplasty: results from a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Clermont E Dionne; Étienne L Belzile; Renée Bourbonnais; François Champagne; Pierre Frémont; François Desmeules
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-03-28

Review 10.  Exercise for people with hip or knee osteoarthritis: a comparison of land-based and aquatic interventions.

Authors:  Ann E Rahmann
Journal:  Open Access J Sports Med       Date:  2010-07-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.