Literature DB >> 15910401

Biological and psychological differences in the child and adolescent transplant recipient.

Daphne T Hsu1.   

Abstract

Solid organ transplantation has become accepted therapy for the treatment of end-stage organ dysfunction in children. As early management of the pediatric transplant recipient has improved, important age-related differences in long-term patient outcomes have become apparent. Late morbidity and mortality can, in most cases, be attributed to the consequences of long-term immunosuppression: graft loss from under-immunosuppression or an increased incidence of cancer, hypertension, renal failure or diabetes from over-immunosuppression. Age-related differences in both biological and psychological factors play an important role in the optimization of therapy in the transplanted child. Important age-related differences have been demonstrated in all phases of pharmacokinetics: absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination. Information regarding specific age-related pharmacokinetic differences is lacking for many immunosuppressive medications. Further study using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models will lead to more specific recommendations for age-based immunosuppression protocols. Non-adherence is common among solid organ transplant recipients of all ages and the consequences of non-adherence include increased rejection, late graft loss and death. The biological and psychological developmental changes that occur during adolescence place the transplanted adolescent at an even higher risk of non-adherence and poor outcome than other age groups. Further studies to elucidate the importance of both age-related pharmacokinetic and behavioral factors are needed to formulate therapeutic interventions that would improve adherence and patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15910401     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2005.00352.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Transplant        ISSN: 1397-3142


  4 in total

1.  What is the right dose for children?

Authors:  Massimo Cella; Catherijne Knibbe; Meindert Danhof; Oscar Della Pasqua
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Meta-analysis of medical regimen adherence outcomes in pediatric solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Mary Amanda Dew; Annette DeVito Dabbs; Larissa Myaskovsky; Susan Shyu; Diana A Shellmer; Andrea F DiMartini; Jennifer Steel; Mark Unruh; Galen E Switzer; Ron Shapiro; Joel B Greenhouse
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Pediatric Outcomes in Transplant: PersOnaliSing Immunosuppression To ImproVe Efficacy (POSITIVE Study): The Collaboration and Design of a National Transplant Precision Medicine Program.

Authors:  Tanya Papaz; Upton Allen; Tom Blydt-Hansen; Patricia E Birk; Sandar Min; Lorraine Hamiwka; Veronique Phan; Tal Schechter; Donna A Wall; Simon Urschel; Bethany J Foster; Seema Mital
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2018-11-27

Review 4.  Chronic allograft nephropathy.

Authors:  Jeffery T Fletcher; Brian J Nankivell; Stephen I Alexander
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 3.714

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.