Literature DB >> 15909158

Differential responses of human lens epithelial cells to intraocular lenses in vitro: hydrophobic acrylic versus PMMA or silicone discs.

Qi Yan1, Nikole Perdue, E Helene Sage.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of different materials of intraocular lenses (IOLs) on human lens epithelial cell behavior, including adhesion, migration, proliferation, apoptosis, and epithelial-mesenchymal transdifferentiation (EMT) in vitro.
METHODS: Human lens epithelial cells (SRA 01/04) were grown on hydrophobic acrylic (Acrysof), polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), and silicone IOLs. Cellular adhesion, migration, proliferation, and apoptotic assays were performed to assess cell behavior. The expression of EMT markers (fibronectin and type I collagen) produced by cells on IOLs was determined by immunoblotting and immunocytochemistry.
RESULTS: Human lens epithelial cells exhibited preferred adhesion and reduced apoptosis when cultured on acrylic IOLs, in comparison to PMMA and silicone IOLs. Cells grown on acrylic lenses formed a confluent epithelial monolayer. Migration of lens epithelial cells under the acrylic lens was substantially blocked in an in vitro assay. In contrast, cells grown on PMMA and silicone lenses displayed a spindle-shaped, myofibroblast-like morphology, increased apoptosis, reduced adhesion, and enhanced production of EMT proteins such as fibronectin and type I collagen. The migration of lens epithelial cells under PMMA and silicone IOLs was substantial in the in vitro assay.
CONCLUSION: This report demonstrates that hydrophobic acrylic lenses are more capsular biocompatible than PMMA and silicone lenses. The in vitro assays are reliable measurements for evaluating the responses of human lens epithelial cells to different IOL materials, and could advance our understanding of the preferential capsular opacification conferred by different IOL materials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15909158     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-005-1181-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  27 in total

Review 1.  Posterior capsule opacification and anterior capsule opacification.

Authors:  E Bertelmann; C Kojetinsky
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.761

Review 2.  Posterior capsule opacification: a cell biological perspective.

Authors:  I Michael Wormstone
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.467

3.  Relationship between intraocular lens biomaterials and posterior capsule opacification.

Authors:  P G Ursell; D J Spalton; M V Pande; E J Hollick; S Barman; J Boyce; K Tilling
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  The relationship between morphological changes of lens epithelial cells and intraocular lens optic material.

Authors:  K Majima
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Lens epithelial cell outgrowth and matrix formation on intraocular lenses in rabbit eyes.

Authors:  S Saika; S Ohmi; R Kanagawa; S Tanaka; Y Ohnishi; A Ooshima; A Yamanaka
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Membranous proliferation of lens epithelial cells on acrylic, silicone, and poly(methyl methacrylate) lenses.

Authors:  D Kurosaka; K Kato
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  Postoperative membranous proliferation from the anterior capsulotomy margin onto the intraocular lens optic.

Authors:  T Nagamoto; E Hara
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  Alpha-smooth muscle actin expression in cultured lens epithelial cells.

Authors:  T Nagamoto; G Eguchi; D C Beebe
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Uveal and capsular biocompatibility of hydrophilic acrylic, hydrophobic acrylic, and silicone intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Claudette Abela-Formanek; Michael Amon; Gebtraud Schild; Jörg Schauersberger; Georg Heinze; Andreas Kruger
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.351

10.  Human lens epithelial cell line.

Authors:  N Ibaraki; S C Chen; L R Lin; H Okamoto; J M Pipas; V N Reddy
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.467

View more
  5 in total

1.  Lens epithelial cell response to atmospheric pressure plasma modified poly(methylmethacrylate) surfaces.

Authors:  Raechelle A D'Sa; George A Burke; Brian J Meenan
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Evaluating the Biostability of Yellow and Clear Intraocular Lenses with a System Simulating Natural Intraocular Environment.

Authors:  Rijo Hayashi; Shimmin Hayashi; Kiyomi Arai; Shinichirou Yoshida; Makoto Chikuda; Shigeki Machida
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.283

Review 3.  A Review of Complicated Cataract in Retinitis Pigmentosa: Pathogenesis and Cataract Surgery.

Authors:  Yingying Hong; Hongzhe Li; Yang Sun; Yinghong Ji
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  SPARC fusion protein induces cellular adhesive signaling.

Authors:  Lamei Cheng; E Helene Sage; Qi Yan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Surface Modification of Intraocular Lenses.

Authors:  Qi Huang; George Pak-Man Cheng; Kin Chiu; Gui-Qin Wang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 2.628

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.