Literature DB >> 1590872

Prostaglandin E2 gel induction of patients with a prior low transverse cesarean section.

J D Blanco1, M Collins, D Willis, S Prien.   

Abstract

To determine safety and efficacy of induction with prostaglandin E2 gel, we compared the outcome of 25 patients (study group) with an unfavorable cervix, a medical indication for delivery, and one prior low cervical transverse cesarean section to 56 patients (comparison group) with one prior low cervical transverse cesarean section and spontaneous labor. We placed 1 mg of prostaglandin E2 in gel intracervically in the 25 study patients. Common indications for delivery were: diabetes, post dates, and preeclampsia. Although most labor and delivery variables were similar, the study group had a longer mean latent phase (14.2 +/- 13.8 versus 7.3 +/- 3.7 hours: p less than 0.002), but had a shorter mean length of active phase (4.0 +/- 3.5 versus 5.7 +/- 3.0 hours; p less than 0.02). None of the patients in either group had a dehiscence of the uterine scar, nor rupture of the uterus. Both groups had a similar cesarean section rate. Since from the few reported, nonrandomized studies it appears that prostaglandin E2 gel use in patients with a prior low cervical transverse cesarean section may be useful and relatively safe, it may be time to attempt randomized trials of prostaglandin E2 gel versus oxytocin for induction of patients with a prior low cervical transverse cesarean section, unfavorable cervix, and a medical indication for delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1590872     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-994676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Perinatol        ISSN: 0735-1631            Impact factor:   1.862


  6 in total

Review 1.  Evidence based case report: use of prostaglandins to induce labour in women with a caesarean section scar.

Authors:  S Vause; M Macintosh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-04-17

Review 2.  Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section.

Authors:  Jeanne-Marie Guise; Marian S McDonagh; Patricia Osterweil; Peggy Nygren; Benjamin K S Chan; Mark Helfand
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-03

Review 3.  Hormonal and local regulation of uterine activity during parturition: Part II--The prostaglandin and adrenergic systems.

Authors:  M Maggi; E Baldi; T Susini
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 4.  Robotic repair of uterine dehiscence.

Authors:  Mauricio Francisco La Rosa; Shirley McCarthy; Christine Richter; Masoud Azodi
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2013 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

5.  Evaluating trial of scar in patients with a history of caesarean section.

Authors:  Aliya Islam; Ambreen Ehsan; Saadia Arif; Javeria Murtaza; Ayesha Hanif
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2011-04

6.  Clinical interventions that influence vaginal birth after cesarean delivery rates: Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Aireen Wingert; Lisa Hartling; Meghan Sebastianski; Cydney Johnson; Robin Featherstone; Ben Vandermeer; R Douglas Wilson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.007

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.