Literature DB >> 15908539

CT colonography after fecal tagging with a reduced cathartic cleansing and a reduced volume of barium.

Philippe Lefere1, Stefaan Gryspeerdt, Jesse Marrannes, Marc Baekelandt, Bartel Van Holsbeeck.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to assess the efficacy of fecal tagging with a small volume of barium in combination with a reduced cathartic cleansing before CT colonography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study consists of a review of 200 patients examined in a clinical setting. Conventional colonoscopy and CT colonography or follow-up were used as the gold standard. All patients prepared for CT colonography the day before the examination with a dedicated low-residue diet. Fecal tagging was performed with 50 mL of barium. The residual feces and fluid were evaluated on a segmental basis. The residual feces was divided in two categories (< 6 mm and > or = 6 mm). The amount of fluid was assessed on the axial slices. The efficacy of tagging was evaluated visually.
RESULTS: For the study, 1,200 segments were evaluated. Residual feces was present in 413 segments (34.41%), with feces less than 6 mm in 210 segments (17.5%) and feces 6 mm or greater in 203 segments (16.92%). There was residual fluid in 527 segments (43.91%). Nontagged feces 6 mm or greater was present in 49 segments (4.08%) and nontagged fluid in 178 segments (14.83%). All nontagged feces 6 mm or greater was easy to assess. All fluid redistributed with dual positioning. A total of 65 lesions 6 mm or greater were correctly diagnosed on primary CT colonography. In two patients, two lesions adjacent to each other were misinterpreted as being only one. Another 8-mm lesion was missed.
CONCLUSION: In the present study, CT colonography after fecal tagging with 50 mL of barium combined with a reduced cathartic cleansing was feasible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15908539     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.184.6.01841836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  32 in total

1.  The future of virtual colonography. Interview by Paul C Adams.

Authors:  Helen Fenlon
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.522

2.  Reader error during CT colonography: causes and implications for training.

Authors:  Andrew Slater; Stuart A Taylor; Emily Tam; Louise Gartner; Julia Scarth; Chand Peiris; Arun Gupta; Michele Marshall; David Burling; Steve Halligan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Fully automated three-dimensional detection of polyps in fecal-tagging CT colonography.

Authors:  Janne Näppi; Hiroyuki Yoshida
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 4.  CT colonography: an update.

Authors:  Andrik J Aschoff; Andrea S Ernst; Hans-Juergen Brambs; Markus S Juchems
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Adaptive correction of the pseudo-enhancement of CT attenuation for fecal-tagging CT colonography.

Authors:  Janne Näppi; Hiroyuki Yoshida
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  [CT colonography: patient preparation and examination technique].

Authors:  P Lefere; S Gryspeerdt; T Mang
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Diagnostic performance of CT colonography for the detection of colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Ji-young Yun; Hee Jeong Ro; Jong Beom Park; Jung-Bin Choi; Ji Eun Chung; Yong Jin Kim; Won Hyuck Suh; Jong Kyun Lee
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.500

8.  CT colonography with minimal bowel preparation: evaluation of tagging quality, patient acceptance and diagnostic accuracy in two iodine-based preparation schemes.

Authors:  Marjolein H Liedenbaum; A H de Vries; C I B F Gouw; A F van Rijn; S Bipat; E Dekker; J Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Primary uncleansed 2D versus primary electronically cleansed 3D in limited bowel preparation CT-colonography. Is there a difference for novices and experienced readers?

Authors:  Ayso H de Vries; Marjolein H Liedenbaum; Shandra Bipat; Roel Truyen; Iwo W O Serlie; Rutger H Cohen; Saskia G C van Elderen; Anneke Heutinck; Oskar Kesselring; Wouter de Monyé; Lambertus te Strake; Tjeerd Wiersma; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: prospective assessment of patient experience and preference in comparison to optical colonoscopy with cathartic bowel preparation.

Authors:  Sebastiaan Jensch; Shandra Bipat; Jan Peringa; Ayso H de Vries; Anneke Heutinck; Evelien Dekker; Lubbertus C Baak; Alexander D Montauban van Swijndregt; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.