BACKGROUND: Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of death among American women. Currently, global risk assessment derived by Framingham risk equation (FRE) is used to identify women at increased risk for CHD. Electron-beam computed tomography (EBCT) derived coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores are validated markers for future CHD events among asymptomatic individuals. However, the adequacy of FRE for identifying asymptomatic women with CAC is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 2447 consecutive non-diabetic asymptomatic females (55 +/- 10 years). Based upon FRE, 90% were classified as low-risk (FRE < or = 9% 10-year risk of hard CHD events), 10% intermediate-risk (10-20%), and none were considered as high-risk (> 20%). Coronary artery calcium was present in 33%, whereas CAC > or = 100 and CAC > or = 400 were seen in 10 and 3% of women, respectively. Overall, 20% of women had age-gender derived > or = 75th percentile CAC. According to FRE, the majority (84%) of women with significant CAC > or = 75th percentile were classified as low-risk. Approximately half (45%) of low-risk women with > or = 2 CHD risk factors and a family history of premature CHD had significant CAC. CONCLUSION: Framingham risk equation frequently classifies women as being low-risk, even in the presence of significant CAC. Determination of CAC may provide incremental value to FRE in identifying asymptomatic women who will benefit from targeted preventative measures.
BACKGROUND:Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of death among American women. Currently, global risk assessment derived by Framingham risk equation (FRE) is used to identify women at increased risk for CHD. Electron-beam computed tomography (EBCT) derived coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores are validated markers for future CHD events among asymptomatic individuals. However, the adequacy of FRE for identifying asymptomatic women with CAC is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 2447 consecutive non-diabetic asymptomatic females (55 +/- 10 years). Based upon FRE, 90% were classified as low-risk (FRE < or = 9% 10-year risk of hard CHD events), 10% intermediate-risk (10-20%), and none were considered as high-risk (> 20%). Coronary artery calcium was present in 33%, whereas CAC > or = 100 and CAC > or = 400 were seen in 10 and 3% of women, respectively. Overall, 20% of women had age-gender derived > or = 75th percentile CAC. According to FRE, the majority (84%) of women with significant CAC > or = 75th percentile were classified as low-risk. Approximately half (45%) of low-risk women with > or = 2 CHD risk factors and a family history of premature CHD had significant CAC. CONCLUSION: Framingham risk equation frequently classifies women as being low-risk, even in the presence of significant CAC. Determination of CAC may provide incremental value to FRE in identifying asymptomatic women who will benefit from targeted preventative measures.
Authors: Whady Hueb; Neuza Lopes; Paulo R Soares; Bernard J Gersh; Eduardo Gomes Lima; Ricardo D Oliveira Vieira; Cibele Larrosa Garzillo; Rosa Rhami Garcia; Alexandre Costa Pereira; Celia Maria Strunz; Claudio Meneguetti; Jeane Tsutsui; Jose Parga; Pedro Lemos; Alexandre Hueb; Augusto Ushida; Raul Maranhão; Dalton A Chamone; Jose Af Ramires Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2010-09-29 Impact factor: 2.298
Authors: B Delia Johnson; Kathleen M Dwyer; Frank Z Stanczyk; Vera Bittner; Sarah L Berga; Glenn D Braunstein; Ricardo Azziz; YuChing Yang; Georgina E Hale; C Noel Bairey Merz Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2010-06-16 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Gaetano Nucifora; Joanne D Schuijf; Jacob M van Werkhoven; J Wouter Jukema; Roxana Djaberi; Arthur J H A Scholte; Albert de Roos; Martin J Schalij; Ernst E van der Wall; Jeroen J Bax Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2009-02-14 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Michael G Silverman; Michael J Blaha; Harlan M Krumholz; Matthew J Budoff; Ron Blankstein; Christopher T Sibley; Arthur Agatston; Roger S Blumenthal; Khurram Nasir Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2013-12-23 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Nivee P Amin; Seth S Martin; Michael J Blaha; Khurram Nasir; Roger S Blumenthal; Erin D Michos Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-05-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: H Kälsch; N Lehmann; S Möhlenkamp; T Neumann; U Slomiany; Axel Schmermund; Andreas Stang; S Moebus; M Bauer; K Mann; K-H Jöckel; R Erbel Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 5.460