Literature DB >> 15907679

Systematic literature reviews.

Adrian White1, Katja Schmidt.   

Abstract

Systematic reviews retrieve, appraise and summarise all the available evidence on a specific health question. They are designed to reduce the effect of the reviewers' own bias, and a full protocol should be written to define and guide the process. The appropriate resources should be in place before undertaking a review. The steps of the review are: frame the question and choose appropriate methods; identify relevant work; extract relevant data on outcomes and quality; summarise the evidence; and, interpret the evidence. Reviews that combine valid, homogeneous studies of treatments that are relevant to health care, in patients who are typical, can provide good evidence to guide health care decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15907679     DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2004.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Complement Ther Med        ISSN: 0965-2299            Impact factor:   2.446


  6 in total

Review 1.  Twenty-five years later--what do we know about religion/spirituality and psychological well-being among breast cancer survivors? A systematic review.

Authors:  Judith A Schreiber; Dorothy Y Brockopp
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2011-12-25       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 2.  Applied Research in Quality of Life: A Computational Literature Review.

Authors:  Christian Weismayer
Journal:  Appl Res Qual Life       Date:  2021-08-09

Review 3.  Prevalence of gastrointestinal pathogens in Sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stephanie M Fletcher; Damien Stark; John Ellis
Journal:  J Public Health Afr       Date:  2011-09-05

4.  Gender differences in information and communication technology use & skills: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Atika Qazi; Najmul Hasan; Olusola Abayomi-Alli; Glenn Hardaker; Ronny Scherer; Yeahia Sarker; Sanjoy Kumar Paul; Jaafar Zubairu Maitama
Journal:  Educ Inf Technol (Dordr)       Date:  2021-10-21

5.  Evaluation of dimensions and measurement scales in patient-centeredness.

Authors:  Jördis M Zill; Isabelle Scholl; Martin Härter; Jörg Dirmaier
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 6.  A scoping review of research on complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and the mass media: looking back, moving forward.

Authors:  Laura C Weeks; Tina Strudsholm
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2008-07-19       Impact factor: 3.659

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.