Literature DB >> 15907672

Comparison of traditional Chinese acupuncture, minimal acupuncture at non-acupoints and conventional treatment for chronic sinusitis.

E Rössberg1, P G Larsson, O Birkeflet, L-E Söholt, K Stavem.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare traditional Chinese acupuncture, minimal acupuncture at non-acupoints and conventional treatment for chronic sinusitis.
DESIGN: A three-armed single blind randomised controlled study.
SETTING: In an outpatient specialist clinic, we recruited 65 patients with symptoms of sinusitis >3 months and signs of sinusitis on computed tomography (CT).
INTERVENTIONS: We randomised patients to one of three study arms: (1) 2-4 weeks of medication with antibiotics, corticosteroids, 0.9% sodium chloride solution, and local decongestants (n=21), (2) 10 treatments with traditional Chinese acupuncture (n=25), or (3) 10 treatments with minimal acupuncture at non-acupoints (n=19). OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in sinus soft tissue swelling on CT, symptoms of sinusitis, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), using the two component summary scales of the Short Form 36 and a rating scale.
RESULTS: In the conventional treatment group, sinus soft tissue swelling was reduced over 4 weeks (p=0.04), and HRQoL improved over 12 weeks (p=0.01-0.05). Pairwise comparisons of changes in total symptom score between the groups showed signs of a difference between conventional medication and sham over 4 weeks (p=0.06).
CONCLUSION: Sinus soft tissue swelling was reduced in the conventional treatment group over 4 weeks, and HRQoL improved over 12 weeks. Only a non-significant difference in symptom score change over 4 and 12 weeks was shown between conventional medication and traditional Chinese acupuncture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15907672     DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2005.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Complement Ther Med        ISSN: 0965-2299            Impact factor:   2.446


  9 in total

1.  [Rhinosinusitis guidelines--unabridged version: S2 guidelines from the German Society of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery].

Authors:  B A Stuck; C Bachert; P Federspil; W Hosemann; L Klimek; R Mösges; O Pfaar; C Rudack; H Sitter; M Wagenmann; R Weber; K Hörmann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Rhinosinusitis guidelines of the German Society for Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery].

Authors:  B A Stuck; C Bachert; P Federspil; W Hosemann; L Klimek; R Mösges; O Pfaar; C Rudack; H Sitter; M Wagenmann; K Hörmann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Reliability, validity and responsiveness of a Norwegian version of the Chronic Sinusitis Survey.

Authors:  Knut Stavem; Edna Røssberg; Pål G Larsson
Journal:  BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord       Date:  2006-05-05

Review 4.  How might acupuncture work? A systematic review of physiologic rationales from clinical trials.

Authors:  Howard H Moffet
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 3.659

Review 5.  Comparing Verum and Sham Acupuncture in Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jiwon Kim; Su-Ryun Kim; Hyangsook Lee; Dong-Hyun Nam
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2019-08-25       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 6.  Common respiratory diseases.

Authors:  David Kilgore; Wadie Najm
Journal:  Prim Care       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.907

Review 7.  Acupuncture for the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A PRISMA-Compliant Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Boram Lee; Chan-Young Kwon; Man Young Park
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Health-related quality of life in a trial of acupuncture, sham acupuncture and conventional treatment for chronic sinusitis.

Authors:  Knut Stavem; Edna Røssberg; Pål G Larsson
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2008-06-27

Review 9.  Complementary and integrative treatments: rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Malcolm B Taw; Chau T Nguyen; Marilene B Wang
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 3.346

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.