Literature DB >> 15907019

Design and implementation of a performance measurement system in Swedish health care services: a multiple case study of 6 development teams.

Beata Kollberg1, Mattias Elg, Jan Lindmark.   

Abstract

Performance measurement is considered to be an important part in improving and controlling contemporary organizations. Despite the increased interest in using and improving performance measurement systems, the number of researchers investigating the design and implementation process in more detail is still very small. The purpose of this article is to increase the understanding of how a performance measurement system, called the flow model, is designed and implemented by development teams in Swedish health care. The purpose of the flow model is to follow up the requirements in the National Care Guarantee through 8 measures. From a multiple case study of 6 local development teams, we conclude that the performance measurement system of the flow model is designed and implemented in Swedish County Councils through 3 development tracks, which are reflected in close interaction between the local development team and people in clinical departments. Enabling factors in the design and implementation are (1) the recognition of a need to change the current situation, (2) the teams' interaction with people in the clinical departments, (3) the national network meetings arranged by the financier, (4) the struggle to motivate and inform the top management, and (5) the establishment of contact with other development teams and ongoing projects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15907019     DOI: 10.1097/00019514-200504000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care        ISSN: 1063-8628            Impact factor:   0.926


  6 in total

1.  Implementing quality indicators in intensive care units: exploring barriers to and facilitators of behaviour change.

Authors:  Maartje Lg de Vos; Sabine N van der Veer; Wilco C Graafmans; Nicolette F de Keizer; Kitty J Jager; Gert P Westert; Peter Hj van der Voort
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 2.  What is the value and impact of quality and safety teams? A scoping review.

Authors:  Deborah E White; Sharon E Straus; H Tom Stelfox; Jayna M Holroyd-Leduc; Chaim M Bell; Karen Jackson; Jill M Norris; W Ward Flemons; Michael E Moffatt; Alan J Forster
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 3.  Assisting allied health in performance evaluation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lucylynn Lizarondo; Karen Grimmer; Saravana Kumar
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Using quality measures for quality improvement: the perspective of hospital staff.

Authors:  Asgar Aghaei Hashjin; Hamid Ravaghi; Dionne S Kringos; Uzor C Ogbu; Claudia Fischer; Saeid Reza Azami; Niek S Klazinga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Experimental studies to improve the reliability and validity of regulatory judgments on health care in the Netherlands: a randomized controlled trial and before and after case study.

Authors:  Saskia M Tuijn; Huub van den Bergh; Paul Robben; Frans Janssens
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 2.431

6.  ASPIRE for quality: a new evidence-based tool to evaluate clinical service performance.

Authors:  Jeric Uy; Lucylynn Lizarondo; Alvin Atlas
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2016-06-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.