Literature DB >> 1590693

Effect of inoculum size on bacteriolytic activity of cefminox and four other beta-lactam antibiotics against Escherichia coli.

F Soriano1, R Edwards, D Greenwood.   

Abstract

MICs and turbidimetric experiments revealed a negligible inoculum effect with two Escherichia coli strains exposed to cefminox and cefoxitin, whereas a marked inoculum effect was revealed after exposure to cefotaxime, ceftizoxime, and imipenem. The activities of the cephamycins were associated with spheroplast formation and bacteriolysis at concentrations close to the MIC, whereas the other agents induced the formation of filaments or, in the case of imipenem, rounded cells.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  1992        PMID： 1590693      PMCID： PMC189272          DOI： 10.1128/AAC.36.1.223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN： 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  13 in total

1.  Comparison of the inoculum effects of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae on cefoxitin and other cephalosporins, beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations, and the penicillin-derived components of these combinations.

Authors:  E J Goldstein; D M Citron; C E Cherubin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Relevance of the inoculum effect of antibiotics in the outcome of experimental infections caused by Escherichia coli.

Authors:  F Soriano; C Ponte; M Santamaría; M Jimenez-Arriero
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Comparison of the responses of Escherichia coli and proteus mirabilis to seven beta-lactam antibodies.

Authors:  D Greenwood; F O'Grady
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  In vivo significance of the inoculum effect of antibiotics on Escherichia coli.

Authors:  F Soriano; M Santamaría; C Ponte; C Castilla; R Fernández-Roblas
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Antibacterial activity of cefotaxime.

Authors:  S Mitsuhashi; M Inoue; S Masuyoshi
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of MT-141, a new semisynthetic cephamycin, compared with those of five cephalosporins.

Authors:  S Inouye; H Goi; T Watanabe; T Hara; K Miyauchi; T Yoshida; Y Kazuno; H Kadosawa; F Hirano; K Kawaharajo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  The inhibitory quotient. A method for interpreting minimum inhibitory concentration data.

Authors:  P D Ellner; H C Neu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1981-10-02       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Antibacterial activity of cefminox against anaerobes.

Authors:  K Watanabe; K Sawa; M Bunai; K Ueno
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  The bacteriolytic action of MT-141, a new cephamycin antibiotic, on gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  T Tsuruoka; Y Yamada; H Goi; K Miyauchi; A Miyata; S Inouye; F Ishino; A Hirata; M Matsuhashi
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  Differences between ceftizoxime and its stereoisomer in antibacterial activity and affinity for penicillin-binding proteins.

Authors:  Y Shigi; H Kojo; M Wakasugi; M Nishida
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 5.191
View more
  8 in total

1.  Inoculum effect of β-lactam antibiotics.

Authors:  Justin R Lenhard; Zackery P Bulman
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Correlation between in vitro and in vivo activities of GM 237354, a new sordarin derivative, against Candida albicans in an in vitro pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model and influence of protein binding.

Authors:  P Aviles; C Falcoz; M J Guillén; R San Roman; F Gómez De Las Heras; D Gargallo-Viola
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Effect of pathological changes of pH, pO2 and pCO2 on the activity of antimicrobial agents in vitro.

Authors:  C König; H P Simmen; J Blaser
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  In vitro activities of cefminox against anaerobic bacteria compared with those of nine other compounds.

Authors:  D B Hoellman; S K Spangler; M R Jacobs; P C Appelbaum
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  In vitro activity of trovafloxacin against Bacteroides fragilis in mixed culture with either Escherichia coli or a vancomycin- resistant strain of Enterococcus faecium determined by an anaerobic time-kill technique.

Authors:  L E Stearne; C Kooi; W H Goessens; I A Bakker-Woudenberg; I C Gyssens
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Correlation of pharmacodynamic parameters of five beta-lactam antibiotics with therapeutic efficacies in an animal model.

Authors:  F Soriano; P García-Corbeira; C Ponte; R Fernández-Roblas; I Gadea
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Direct, rapid antimicrobial susceptibility test from positive blood cultures based on microscopic imaging analysis.

Authors:  Jungil Choi; Hyun Yong Jeong; Gi Yoon Lee; Sangkwon Han; Shinhun Han; Bonghwan Jin; Taegeun Lim; Shin Kim; Dong Young Kim; Hee Chan Kim; Eui-Chong Kim; Sang Hoon Song; Taek Soo Kim; Sunghoon Kwon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The inoculum effect and band-pass bacterial response to periodic antibiotic treatment.

Authors:  Cheemeng Tan; Robert Phillip Smith; Jaydeep K Srimani; Katherine A Riccione; Sameer Prasada; Meta Kuehn; Lingchong You
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 11.429
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.