Literature DB >> 15906139

Small bowel obstruction: conservative vs. surgical management.

Stephen B Williams1, Jose Greenspon, Heather A Young, Bruce A Orkin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess incidence, risk factors, and recurrence rates for conservative and surgical management of small bowel obstruction.
METHODS: Retrospective chart review was conducted of 329 patients accounting for 487 admissions with small bowel obstruction. Data were obtained from the institutional database and patient charts. Patients with early recurrent small bowel obstruction had prior operations or hospitalization with conservative therapy for small bowel obstruction, then had a hospital stay >10 days following abdominal surgery because of obstruction or required readmission for small bowel obstruction within 30 days. Patients treated for prior small bowel obstruction and then readmitted after 30 days for a recurrent small bowel obstruction were classified as having late recurrent small bowel obstruction.
RESULTS: A total of 329 patients with a diagnosis of small bowel obstruction were identified. At index admission, 43 percent (142) were successfully treated conservatively, whereas 57 percent (187) failed conservative treatment and underwent surgery. Overall, there were eight early deaths, four in each group (2.8 percent conservative vs. 2.1 percent surgical; no significant difference). The frequency of recurrence for those treated nonoperatively was 40.5 percent compared with 26.8 percent for patients treated operatively (P < 0.009). Patients treated without operation had a significantly shorter time to recurrence (mean, 153 vs. 411 days; P < 0.004) and had fewer hospital days for their index small bowel obstruction (4.9 vs. 12.0 days; P < 0.0001). Two hundred one (63 percent) patients had abdominal surgery and 119 (37 percent) patients had no prior abdominal surgery before developing a small bowel obstruction. Previous abdominal operations by procedure type were colorectal surgery (34 percent), gynecologic surgery (28 percent), exploratory laparotomy (20 percent), appendectomy (14 percent), cholecystectomy (12 percent), herniorraphy (8 percent), and gastric bypass (5 percent). The mean time interval between initial procedure and index small bowel obstruction was 1.3 years for gastric bypass, 6.1 years for herniorraphy, 7.8 years for exploratory laparotomy, 8 years for cholecystectomy, 8.4 years for colorectal surgery, 11.8 years for gynecologic surgery, and 22.5 years for appendectomy. There was no significant difference between early and late recurrent small bowel obstruction in patients treated nonoperatively or operatively, regardless of prior history of abdominal surgery. Logistic regression analysis failed to identify any specific risk factors that were predictors of the success of conservative or surgical management.
CONCLUSIONS: Operatively treated patients had a lower frequency of recurrence and a longer time interval to recurrence; however, they also had a longer hospital stay than that of patients treated nonoperatively. There was no significant difference in treatment type or in incidence or type of prior surgery among patients with early and late small bowel obstruction. None of the variables analyzed in this study were significant predictors of the success of a particular treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15906139     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-0882-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  49 in total

1.  Parameter predicting the recurrence of adhesive small bowel obstruction in patients managed with a long tube.

Authors:  Takumi Sakakibara; Akio Harada; Tadao Ishikawa; Yoshinao Komatsu; Toyohisa Yaguchi; Yasuhiro Kodera; Akimasa Nakao
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Transnasal fine gastrointestinal fiberscope-guided long tube insertion for patients with small bowel obstruction.

Authors:  Mitsuru Ishizuka; Hitoshi Nagata; Kazutoshi Takagi; Keiichi Kubota
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Da-cheng-qi decoction, a traditional Chinese herbal formula, for intestinal obstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bo Yang; Feng-Ying Xu; Hai-Jing Sun; Zui Zou; Xue-Yin Shi; Chang-Quan Ling; Ling Tang
Journal:  Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med       Date:  2014-06-04

4.  Comparative Validation of Abdominal CT Models that Predict Need for Surgery in Adhesion-Related Small-Bowel Obstruction.

Authors:  Phillip F Yang; Dean P Rabinowitz; Shing W Wong; Maroof A Khan; Robert C Gandy
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Decision Making in Bowel Obstruction: A Review.

Authors:  Aswini Kumar Pujahari
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-11-01

6.  Outcomes After Surgery for Benign and Malignant Small Bowel Obstruction.

Authors:  Lauren M Wancata; Zaid M Abdelsattar; Pasithorn A Suwanabol; Darrell A Campbell; Samantha Hendren
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  Laparoscopic approach to acute small bowel obstruction: review of 1061 cases.

Authors:  Bashar Ghosheh; J R Salameh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Reoperation for small bowel obstruction--how critical is the timing?

Authors:  Joseph C Carmichael; Steven Mills
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2006-11

9.  Long-term follow-up of the use of the Jones' intestinal tube in adhesive small bowel obstruction.

Authors:  M Z Fazel; R W Jamieson; C J E Watson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Pattern of acute intestinal obstruction: is there a change in the underlying etiology?

Authors:  Arshad M Malik; Madiha Shah; Rafique Pathan; Krishan Sufi
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.485

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.