Literature DB >> 15904979

The results of newborn hearing screening by means of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Katarzyna Wroblewska-Seniuk1, Karolina Chojnacka, Beata Pucher, Jerzy Szczapa, Janusz Gadzinowski, Michal Grzegorowski.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The incidence of sensorineural hearing loss is between 1 and 3 per 1000 in healthy neonates and 2-4 per 100 in high-risk children. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) represent a method which can be applied to all newborns prior to hospital discharge, enabling early identification of hearing loss. The aim of the study was to evaluate the results of newborn hearing screening by means of TEOAEs.
METHODS: Between 01.10.2002 and 30.09.2003, 5601 newborns born in the University Hospital in Poznan, Poland were screened with ERO SCAN (MAICO). Healthy neonates were screened in the second or third day of life and children treated in pathology unit--when their general condition was stable. The risk factors of hearing loss were recorded in a questionnaire. Children who failed the screening test or had risk factors of hearing impairment were referred to the outpatient clinic for further evaluation.
RESULTS: Risk factors were identified in 739 newborns. The most often risk factors were: use of ototoxic drugs, low Apgar score and prematurity. Positive test result was obtained in 219 (3.91%) children unilaterally and in 137 (2.45%) bilaterally. In healthy children the prevalence of positive results was 3.56% and in high-risk infants 24.9%. The relative risk of positive test results was the highest in infants with positive family history (RR=7.5), congenital malformations (RR=6.7) and low Apgar score (RR=5). Of the group of 912 children, who were referred to the specialist, only 218 turned up to be assessed during the observation period and had the additional otoacoustic emission test performed. There was not any significant difference in the percentage of children with and without risk factors who turned up for the second test and in whom the result was positive (39.7% versus 40.3%). In 41.9% children with risk factors whose screening test was negative, the second exam gave positive result.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of positive results in newborn hearing screening is much higher than the prevalence of hearing loss in general population and these results need verification by more precise methods. However, TEOAEs enable to select children who should be referred for audiological evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15904979     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.03.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  12 in total

1.  Pregnancy and newborn outcomes after exposure to bisphosphonates: a case-control study.

Authors:  A Sokal; E Elefant; T Leturcq; D Beghin; X Mariette; R Seror
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Universal newborn hearing screening: methods and results, obstacles, and benefits.

Authors:  Katarzyna E Wroblewska-Seniuk; Piotr Dabrowski; Witold Szyfter; Jan Mazela
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.756

3.  Universal newborn hearing screening with automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) in Hungary: 5-year experience in diagnostics and influence on the early intervention.

Authors:  Anita Gáborján; Gábor Katona; Miklós Szabó; Béla Muzsik; Marianna Küstel; Mihály Horváth; László Tamás
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.236

4.  [Assessment of levels of otoacoustic emission response in neonates with perinatal asphyxia].

Authors:  Georgea Espindola Ribeiro; Daniela Polo Camargo da Silva; Jair Cortez Montovani
Journal:  Rev Paul Pediatr       Date:  2014-10-03

5.  Hearing loss screening tool (COBRA score) for newborns in primary care setting.

Authors:  Watcharapol Poonual; Niramon Navacharoen; Jaran Kangsanarak; Sirianong Namwongprom; Surasak Saokaew
Journal:  Korean J Pediatr       Date:  2017-11-27

6.  Hearing impairment in premature newborns-Analysis based on the national hearing screening database in Poland.

Authors:  Katarzyna Wroblewska-Seniuk; Grazyna Greczka; Piotr Dabrowski; Joanna Szyfter-Harris; Jan Mazela
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Protocol and programme factors associated with referral and loss to follow-up from newborn hearing screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Allison R Mackey; Andrea M L Bussé; Valeria Del Vecchio; Elina Mäki-Torkko; Inger M Uhlén
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 2.567

8.  Survey on Infant Hearing Loss at Caritas Baby Hospital in Bethlehem-Palestine.

Authors:  Lucia Corradin; Musa Hindiyeh; Rasha Khaled; Fadi Rishmawi; Marwan Zidan; Hiyam Marzouqa
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2014-11-21

9.  Targeted versus Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening in a Single Egyptian Center.

Authors:  Safaa S Imam; Rania A El-Farrash; Hesham M Taha; Helbees E Bishoy
Journal:  ISRN Pediatr       Date:  2013-09-12

10.  Risk factors for hearing loss in infants under universal hearing screening program in Northern Thailand.

Authors:  Watcharapol Poonual; Niramon Navacharoen; Jaran Kangsanarak; Sirianong Namwongprom
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2015-12-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.