Literature DB >> 15904746

A new approach to eliciting patients' preferences for palliative day care: the choice experiment method.

Hannah-Rose Douglas1, Charles E Normand, Irene J Higginson, Danielle M Goodwin.   

Abstract

Palliative day care (PDC) provides individualized care to meet patients' needs and preferences and has posed problems for economic evaluation. Current methods are limited in their ability to capture relevant outcomes. The choice experiment elicits preferences for multiple aspects of care rather than a single outcome. A choice experiment was undertaken at four centers in England. A random effects probit model was used. Interaction terms relating to patient and service characteristics were explored. Seventy-nine patients participated. All characteristics of PDC except bathing and hairdressing were significant (P < 0.001). Access to specialist therapies was three times as important as medical support and twice as important as staying all day. Interaction terms were not significant, except for age and preference for specialist therapies, although the sample may not have been adequate to detect differences. Choice experiments provided useful insights by quantifying preferences for services, providing an alternative to cost-effectiveness analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15904746     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.08.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  7 in total

1.  Does a social model of hospice day care affect advanced cancer patients' use of other health and social services? A prospective quasi-experimental trial.

Authors:  Irene J Higginson; Wei Gao; Brendan Amesbury; Charles Normand
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-08-08       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Assessment of preferences for treatment: validation of a measure.

Authors:  Souraya Sidani; Dana R Epstein; Richard R Bootzin; Patricia Moritz; Joyal Miranda
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.228

3.  A cost-utility analysis of a rehabilitation service for people living with and beyond cancer.

Authors:  Jeff Round; Baptiste Leurent; Louise Jones
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Raise the Bar, Not the Threshold Value: Meeting Patient Preferences for Palliative and End-of-Life Care.

Authors:  Nikki McCaffrey; Simon Eckermann
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2018-06

5.  Patient empowerment, what does it mean for adults in the advanced stages of a life-limiting illness: A systematic review using critical interpretive synthesis.

Authors:  Dominique Wakefield; Jo Bayly; Lucy Ellen Selman; Alice M Firth; Irene J Higginson; Fliss Em Murtagh
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 4.762

6.  Discrete choice experiment for eliciting preference for health services for patients with ALS and their informal caregivers.

Authors:  Katy Tobin; Sinead Maguire; Orla Hardiman; Miriam Galvin; Bernie Corr; Charles Normand
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Mixed methods research in the development and evaluation of complex interventions in palliative and end-of-life care: report on the MORECare consensus exercise.

Authors:  Morag Farquhar; Nancy Preston; Catherine J Evans; Gunn Grande; Vicky Short; Hamid Benalia; Irene J Higginson; Chris Todd
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.947

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.