Literature DB >> 15904614

A comparison of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy outcomes.

O Robert Sarmini1, Kimberly Lefholz, Harry P Froeschke.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To compare operative and postoperative results of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) and total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH).
DESIGN: Cohort retrospective analysis of consecutive patients (Canadian Task Force classification II-3).
SETTING: Department of gynecology at a metropolitan medical center. PATIENTS: Two hundred-twenty women who underwent LSH with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO). Two hundred-twenty women who underwent TAH with or without BSO. Both groups had similar surgical indications and final pathology.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Women who underwent LSH had a shorter operating time than those in the TAH group (47.7 +/- 14.6 min vs 74.9 +/- 25.6 min). Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LSH group, and those patients returned to work sooner. The operative complication rate was higher in the TAH group (2.7% vs 0.9%). Postoperative complication rate for the TAH group was higher than the LSH group (25% vs zero).
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy is a safe and effective surgical treatment for patients in need of a hysterectomy with or without BSO. The procedure can be performed in an outpatient setting. Patients experience a much quicker recovery than those who undergo TAH, and the complication rate is significantly lower.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15904614     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2005.01.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  8 in total

1.  National German Guideline (S2k): Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Endometriosis: Long Version - AWMF Registry No. 015-045.

Authors:  U Ulrich; O Buchweitz; R Greb; J Keckstein; I von Leffern; P Oppelt; S P Renner; M Sillem; W Stummvoll; R-L De Wilde; K-W Schweppe
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  Interdisciplinary S2k Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Endometriosis: Short Version - AWMF Registry No. 015-045, August 2013.

Authors:  U Ulrich; O Buchweitz; R Greb; J Keckstein; I von Leffern; P Oppelt; S P Renner; M Sillem; W Stummvoll; K-W Schweppe
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Postoperative readmissions following laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: a comparison.

Authors:  John P Judd; Kenneth Byrd; Mark Jiang
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2007

4.  Twenty-first century laparoscopic hysterectomy: should we not leave the vaginal step out?

Authors:  A R H Twijnstra; N A Kianmanesh Rad; M J G H Smeets; J F Admiraal; F W Jansen
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2009-03-21

5.  Malignancy rate of 10,731 uteri morcellated during laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LASH).

Authors:  Bernd Bojahr; Rudy Leon De Wilde; Garri Tchartchian
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 6.  Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy for benign gynecologic conditions.

Authors:  Beth Hamilton; Stephanie N McClellan; Mark A Rettenmaier; Bram H Goldstein
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Reactionary hemorrhage in gynecological surgery.

Authors:  Mark Erian; Glenda Mc Laren; Akram Khalil
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

8.  Factors for a Successful Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Very Large Uteri.

Authors:  Harald Krentel; Rudy Leon De Wilde
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2017-09-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.