Literature DB >> 15904503

Blood cultures in ambulatory outpatients.

Kevin B Laupland1, Deirdre L Church, Daniel B Gregson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Blood cultures are a gold standard specific test for diagnosing many infections. However, the low yield may limit their usefulness, particularly in low-risk populations. This study was conducted to assess the utility of blood cultures drawn from ambulatory outpatients.
METHODS: Blood cultures drawn at community-based collection sites in the Calgary Health Region (population 1 million) in 2001 and 2002 were included in this study. These patients were analyzed by linkages to acute care health care databases for utilization of acute care facilities within 2 weeks of blood culture draw.
RESULTS: 3102 sets of cultures were drawn from 1732 ambulatory outpatients (annual rate = 89.4 per 100,000 population). Significant isolates were identified from 73 (2.4%) sets of cultures from 51 patients, including Escherichia coli in 18 (35%) and seven (14%) each of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Compared to patients with negative cultures, those with positive cultures were older (mean 49.6 vs. 40.1 years, p < 0.01), and more likely to subsequently receive care at a regional emergency department, outpatient antibiotic clinic, or hospital (35/51 vs. 296/1681, p < 0.0001). Of the 331 (19%) patients who received acute care treatment, those with positive cultures presented sooner after community culture draw (median 2 vs. 3 days, p < 0.01) and had longer median treatment duration (6 vs. 2 days, p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Blood cultures drawn in outpatient settings are uncommonly positive, but may define patients for increased intensity of therapy. Strategies to reduce utilization without excluding patients with positive cultures need to be developed for this patient population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15904503      PMCID: PMC1156895          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-5-35

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Infect Dis        ISSN: 1471-2334            Impact factor:   3.090


  29 in total

1.  Blood cultures for women with uncomplicated acute pyelonephritis: are they necessary?

Authors:  María Velasco; J Antonio Martínez; Antonio Moreno-Martínez; J Pablo Horcajada; Joaquim Ruiz; Margarita Barranco; Manel Almela; Jordi Vila; José Mensa
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2003-09-19       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of occult bacteremia in an adult emergency department in Spain: influence of blood culture results on changes in initial diagnosis and empiric antibiotic treatment.

Authors:  J M Ramos; M Masiá; M Elía; F Gutiérrez; G Royo; F Bonilla; S Padilla; A Martín-Hidalgo
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Limited clinical utility of blood and urine cultures in the treatment of acute pyelonephritis during pregnancy.

Authors:  D A Wing; A S Park; L Debuque; L K Millar
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 4.  The utility of blood cultures in the management of non-facial cellulitis appears to be low.

Authors:  Anna Stevenson; Phil Hider; Martin Than
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  2005-03-11

5.  Rationale for selective use of anaerobic blood cultures.

Authors:  A J Morris; M L Wilson; S Mirrett; L B Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Empiric antibiotic treatment and the misuse of culture results and antibiotic sensitivities in patients with community-acquired bacteraemia due to urinary tract infection.

Authors:  G Elhanan; M Sarhat; R Raz
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 6.072

7.  Adult patients with occult bacteremia discharged from the emergency department: epidemiological and clinical characteristics.

Authors:  D Epstein; D Raveh; Y Schlesinger; B Rudensky; N P Gottehrer; A M Yinnon
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-02-09       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Blood cultures in pyelonephritis: Do results change therapy?

Authors: 
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.451

9.  Population-based study of the epidemiology of and the risk factors for invasive Staphylococcus aureus infections.

Authors:  Kevin B Laupland; Deirdre L Church; Melissa Mucenski; Lloyd R Sutherland; H Dele Davies
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 5.226

10.  Utility of blood cultures in febrile children with UTI.

Authors:  Raymond D Pitetti; Sylvia Choi
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.469

View more
  10 in total

1.  Deficits in knowledge, attitude, and practice towards blood culture sampling: results of a nationwide mixed-methods study among inpatient care physicians in Germany.

Authors:  Heike Raupach-Rosin; Arne Duddeck; Maike Gehrlich; Charlotte Helmke; Johannes Huebner; Mathias W Pletz; Rafael Mikolajczyk; André Karch
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  Factors associated with positive blood cultures in outpatients with suspected bacteremia.

Authors:  K Wildi; S Tschudin-Sutter; S Dell-Kuster; R Frei; H C Bucher; R Nüesch
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Burden of community-onset bloodstream infection: a population-based assessment.

Authors:  K B Laupland; D B Gregson; W W Flemons; D Hawkins; T Ross; D L Church
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 2.451

4.  Population-based laboratory assessment of the burden of community-onset bloodstream infection in Victoria, Canada.

Authors:  K B Laupland; P C Kibsey; D B Gregson; J C Galbraith
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 4.434

5.  Secular trends of antimicrobial resistance of blood isolates in a newly founded Greek hospital.

Authors:  Matthew E Falagas; Sofia K Kasiakou; Dimitra Nikita; Panayiota Morfou; George Georgoulias; Petros I Rafailidis
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 3.090

6.  Eosinopenia as a diagnostic marker of bloodstream infection in a general internal medicine setting: a cohort study.

Authors:  Takanobu Hirosawa; Yukinori Harada; Kohei Morinaga; Hiroshi Takase; Michihiro Nin; Taro Shimizu
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.090

7.  Longitudinal evaluation of risk factors and outcomes of blood stream infections due to Staphylococcus species in persons with HIV: An observational cohort study.

Authors:  Raynell Lang; M John Gill; Quang Vu; Jeannine Viczko; Chris Naugler; Deirdre Church
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2020-12-05

8.  Rationale for and protocol of a multi-national population-based bacteremia surveillance collaborative.

Authors:  Kevin B Laupland; Henrik C Schønheyder; Karina J Kennedy; Outi Lyytikäinen; Louis Valiquette; John Galbraith; Peter Collignon; Deirdre L Church; Daniel B Gregson; Pamela Kibsey
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2009-07-22

9.  The Validation of a Novel Surveillance System for Monitoring Bloodstream Infections in the Calgary Zone.

Authors:  Jenine R Leal; Daniel B Gregson; Deirdre L Church; Elizabeth A Henderson; Terry Ross; Kevin B Laupland
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.471

10.  Central venous Access device SeCurement And Dressing Effectiveness for peripherally inserted central catheters in adult acute hospital patients (CASCADE): a pilot randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Raymond J Chan; Sarah Northfield; Emily Larsen; Gabor Mihala; Amanda Ullman; Peter Hancock; Nicole Marsh; Nicole Gavin; David Wyld; Anthony Allworth; Emily Russell; Md Abu Choudhury; Julie Flynn; Claire M Rickard
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 2.279

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.