Literature DB >> 15903385

Effect of potentiation and stretching on maximal force, rate of force development, and range of motion.

David M Bazett-Jones1, Jason B Winchester, Jeffrey M McBride.   

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to compare the effects of stretching vs. potentiation on subsequent maximal force and rate of force development capabilities of subjects in an isometric squat. Ten male collegiate athletes participated as subjects in this study. Subjects were tested during 3 separate sessions that involved joint range of motion (ROM) measurements of the lower body and isometric squat trials on a force plate to determine peak force (PF) and rate of force development (RFD) values. One testing session was preceded by 10 minutes of quiet sitting (C), 1 by a 30-minute lower-body stretching protocol (S), and 1 by 3 sets of a leg press exercise using 90% of the subjects' previously determined 1 repetition maximum (P). Three repetitions were performed for each set of the leg press, with a 3-minute rest period between each set. PF during the isometric squat was not significantly different following any of the 3 conditions (C: 100.0 +/- 0.0%, S: 101.2 +/- 6.5%, P: 98.6 +/- 6.2%). However, RFD was significantly lower in P (87.5 +/- 12.8%) compared with both C (100.0 +/- 0.0%) and S (102.6 +/- 18.5%). Significant improvement in ROM occurred only following P. It appears the potentiation protocol used in the current investigation may actually have had fatiguing effects instead of potentiating effects, but it did result in significant increases in ROM.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15903385     DOI: 10.1519/14193.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  6 in total

1.  Static stretching does not alter pre and post-landing muscle activation.

Authors:  Wesley R Moss; J Brent Feland; Iain Hunter; J Ty Hopkins
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol       Date:  2011-05-13

2.  Acute effects of unilateral static stretching on handgrip strength of the stretched and non-stretched limb.

Authors:  Jacob D Jelmini; Andrew Cornwell; Nazareth Khodiguian; Jennifer Thayer; And John Araujo
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Comparing the effects of various whole-body vibration accelerations on counter-movement jump performance.

Authors:  David M Bazett-Jones; Holmes W Finch; Eric L Dugan
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Postactivation potentiation biases maximal isometric strength assessment.

Authors:  Leonardo Coelho Rabello Lima; Felipe Bruno Dias Oliveira; Thiago Pires Oliveira; Claudio de Oliveira Assumpção; Camila Coelho Greco; Adalgiso Croscato Cardozo; Benedito Sérgio Denadai
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  The relevance of stretch intensity and position-a systematic review.

Authors:  Nikos Apostolopoulos; George S Metsios; Andreas D Flouris; Yiannis Koutedakis; Matthew A Wyon
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-18

6.  Effects of plyometric and whole-body vibration on physical performance in collegiate basketball players: a crossover randomized trial.

Authors:  Pratyakshi Munshi; Moazzam Hussain Khan; Nitin Kumar Arora; Shibili Nuhmani; Shahnawaz Anwer; Heng Li; Ahmad H Alghadir
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.