Literature DB >> 15903383

Influence of range of motion in resistance training in women: early phase adaptations.

C Dwayne Massey1, John Vincent, Mark Maneval, J T Johnson.   

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to compare partial range-of-motion versus full range-of-motion training in the development of maximal upper-body strength in women. A 1 repetition maximum bench press was used as the criterion measurement. A 10-week, 2 days per week training regimen was used. Subjects were divided into 3 groups. Group 1 (n = 13) trained with 3 full range-of-motion sets on the bench press. Group 2 (n = 8) trained with 3 partial range-of-motion sets. Group 3 (n = 8), serving as a quasi-control, trained with an equal combination of partial and full range-of-motion sets. Findings indicated that each of the 3 groups experienced an increase in bench-press strength from pre- to posttest. In addition, a statistically significant difference was found between the full range-of-motion group and the partial and mixed groups (p < 0.5). This finding suggests that lifting through a full range of motion was superior to the other training regimens used in this study. However, this investigation also indicated that the partial technique had a positive effect on strength across time within the parameters of this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15903383     DOI: 10.1519/R-14643.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  3 in total

1.  Influence of full range of motion vs. equalized partial range of motion training on muscle architecture and mechanical properties.

Authors:  Maria João Valamatos; Francisco Tavares; Rute M Santos; António P Veloso; Pedro Mil-Homens
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-07-07       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Is There Any Practical Application of Meta-Analytical Results in Strength Training?

Authors:  Paulo Gentil; Antonio Arruda; Daniel Souza; Jurgen Giessing; Antonio Paoli; James Fisher; James Steele
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Differences in unilateral chest press muscle activation and kinematics on a stable versus unstable surface while holding one versus two dumbbells.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Patterson; Andrew D Vigotsky; Nicole E Oppenheimer; Erin H Feser
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 2.984

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.