Literature DB >> 15903024

Routine database registration of biological therapy increases the reporting of adverse events twentyfold in clinical practice. First results from the Danish Database (DANBIO).

M L Hetland1, J Unkerskov, T Ravn, M Friis, U Tarp, L S Andersen, A Petri, H Khan, D I Stenver, A Hansen, M Ostergaard.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To present from the Danish Database for Biological Therapies in Rheumatology (DANBIO) the frequencies and types of adverse events as well as risk factors during treatment with biological agents in clinical practice.
METHODS: Adverse events during the first 2 years of clinical use of biological agents in Denmark were reported to the nationwide DANBIO and compared to the mandatory reports to the Danish Medicines Agency.
RESULTS: Almost 90% of the patients treated with biological agents were registered in the DANBIO, and the database picked up 20 times as many adverse events as the Danish Medicines Agency. Infections and hypersensitivity reactions were the most prevalent adverse events. Age, disease duration, and previous number of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDS) were found to be risk factors for bacterial infections.
CONCLUSION: A routine-based Danish database for biological therapies covers approximately 90% of patients and improves the reporting of adverse events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15903024     DOI: 10.1080/03009740510017968

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0300-9742            Impact factor:   3.641


  7 in total

1.  Do rheumatoid arthritis patients in clinical practice benefit from switching from infliximab to a second tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor?

Authors:  Elisabeth Hjardem; Mikkel Østergaard; Jan Pødenphant; Ulrik Tarp; Lis Smedegaard Andersen; Jette Bing; Elisabeth Peen; Hanne Merete Lindegaard; Vibeke Stevenius Ringsdal; Anne Rødgaard; Jens Skøt; Annette Hansen; Hans Henrik Mogensen; Janne Unkerskov; Merete Lund Hetland
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Biological treatment in rheumatic diseases: results from a longitudinal surveillance: adverse events.

Authors:  L Konttinen; V Honkanen; T Uotila; J Pöllänen; M Waahtera; M Romu; K Puolakka; M Vasala; A Karjalainen; R Luukkainen; D C Nordström
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2006-01-10       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 3.  The association between systemic glucocorticoid therapy and the risk of infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  William G Dixon; Samy Suissa; Marie Hudson
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 5.156

4.  Four-year follow-up of infliximab therapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients with long-standing refractory disease: attrition and long-term evolution of disease activity.

Authors:  Bert Vander Cruyssen; Stijn Van Looy; Bart Wyns; Rene Westhovens; Patrick Durez; Filip Van den Bosch; Herman Mielants; Luc De Clerck; Ann Peretz; Michel Malaise; Leon Verbruggen; Nathan Vastesaeger; Anja Geldhof; Luc Boullart; Filip De Keyser
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.156

5.  Methotrexate utilization in Rheumatoid arthritis. A register-based cohort-study of treatment re-starts after gabs of at least 90 days.

Authors:  Annette de Thurah; Mette Nørgaard; Kristian Stengaard-Pedersen
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-05-15

Review 6.  The Danish nationwide clinical register for patients with rheumatoid arthritis: DANBIO.

Authors:  Else Helene Ibfelt; Dorte Vendelbo Jensen; Merete Lund Hetland
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 4.790

Review 7.  A paradigm shift in studies based on rheumatoid arthritis clinical registries.

Authors:  Soo-Kyung Cho; Yoon-Kyoung Sung
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 2.884

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.