Literature DB >> 15902857

The role of intraoperative frozen section in decision making in revision hip and knee arthroplasties in a local community hospital.

Put Shui Ko1, David Ip, Kai Pun Chow, Florence Cheung, On Bong Lee, James Joseph Lam.   

Abstract

There is little information in the literature regarding the reliability of intraoperative frozen section to predict infection in revision arthroplasties performed in community hospitals as most reports are from specialized centers or academic institutes. Between November 1997 and May 2001, we performed intraoperative frozen sections in 40 revision hip and knee arthroplasties. We used Mirra's criteria of more than 5 polymorphs per high power field to constitute a positive result. We found a sensitivity of 67% and a specificity of 97%. The positive and negative predictive values were 86% and 91%, respectively, with an accuracy of 90%. We conclude that intraoperative frozen section is a reasonably sensitive and specific adjunct investigation in the differentiation between septic and aseptic loosening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15902857     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.06.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  9 in total

1.  Diagnosing periprosthetic infection: false-positive intraoperative Gram stains.

Authors:  Margret Oethinger; Debra K Warner; Susan A Schindler; Hideo Kobayashi; Thomas W Bauer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  [Histopathologic diagnosis of infectious loosening of joint prostheses].

Authors:  I Bos; M Zagorski; C Boos; S Krüger
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  Limitations of Gram staining for the diagnosis of infections following total hip or knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Zhengxiao Ouyang; Zanjing Zhai; A N Qin; Haowei Li; Xuqiang Liu; Xinhua Qu; Kerong Dai
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 4.  Clinical practice. Infection associated with prosthetic joints.

Authors:  Jose L Del Pozo; Robin Patel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Should gram stains have a role in diagnosing hip arthroplasty infections?

Authors:  Aaron J Johnson; Michael G Zywiel; D Alex Stroh; David R Marker; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The EBJIS definition of periprosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Martin McNally; Ricardo Sousa; Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker; Antonia F Chen; Alex Soriano; H Charles Vogely; Martin Clauss; Carlos A Higuera; Rihard Trebše
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 5.082

7.  The Rule of Histology in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Infection: Specific Granulocyte Counting Methods and New Immunohistologic Staining Techniques may Increase the Diagnostic Value.

Authors:  Friedrich Boettner; Gabriele Koehler; Alexander Wegner; Tom Schmidt-Braekling; Georg Gosheger; Christian Goetze
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2016-09-26

8.  Intraoperative evaluation of polymorphonuclear leukocyte during second-stage revision surgery promote overdiagnosis of persistent periprosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Yoshinobu Saitoh; Takao Setoguchi; Takako Yoshioka; Junichiro Nishi; Akihide Tanimoto; Setsuro Komiya
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 1.511

Review 9.  Histopathology in Periprosthetic Joint Infection: When Will the Morphomolecular Diagnosis Be a Reality?

Authors:  G Bori; M A McNally; N Athanasou
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-13       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.