AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: It is well established that total systemic adiponectin is reduced in type 2 diabetic subjects. To date most studies have been concerned with the singular full-length protein or proteolytically cleaved globular domain. It is, however, apparent that the native protein circulates in serum as a lower molecular weight hexamer and as larger multimeric structures of high molecular weight (HMW). In this study we address the clinical significance of each form of the protein with respect to glucose tolerance. METHODS: Serum was obtained from 34 Indo-Asian male subjects (BMI 26.5+/-3.1; age 52.15+/-10.14 years) who had undertaken a 2-h oral glucose tolerance test. An aliquot of serum was fractionated using velocity sedimentation followed by reducing SDS-PAGE. Western blots were probed for adiponectin, and HMW adiponectin as a percentage of total adiponectin (percentage of higher molecular weight adiponectin [S(A)] index) was calculated from densitometry readings. Total adiponectin was measured using ELISA; leptin, insulin and IL-6 were determined using ELISA. RESULTS: Analysis of the cohort demonstrated that total adiponectin (r = 0.625, p = 0.0001), fasting insulin (r = -0.354, p = 0.040) and age (r = 0.567, p = 0.0001) correlated with S(A). S(A) showed a tighter, inverse correlation with 2-h glucose levels (r = -0.58, p = 0.0003) than total adiponectin (r = -0.38, p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: This study demonstrates the importance of the S(A) index as a better determinant of glucose intolerance than measurements of total adiponectin. Our findings suggest that HMW adiponectin is the active form of the protein.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: It is well established that total systemic adiponectin is reduced in type 2 diabetic subjects. To date most studies have been concerned with the singular full-length protein or proteolytically cleaved globular domain. It is, however, apparent that the native protein circulates in serum as a lower molecular weight hexamer and as larger multimeric structures of high molecular weight (HMW). In this study we address the clinical significance of each form of the protein with respect to glucose tolerance. METHODS: Serum was obtained from 34 Indo-Asian male subjects (BMI 26.5+/-3.1; age 52.15+/-10.14 years) who had undertaken a 2-h oral glucose tolerance test. An aliquot of serum was fractionated using velocity sedimentation followed by reducing SDS-PAGE. Western blots were probed for adiponectin, and HMW adiponectin as a percentage of total adiponectin (percentage of higher molecular weight adiponectin [S(A)] index) was calculated from densitometry readings. Total adiponectin was measured using ELISA; leptin, insulin and IL-6 were determined using ELISA. RESULTS: Analysis of the cohort demonstrated that total adiponectin (r = 0.625, p = 0.0001), fasting insulin (r = -0.354, p = 0.040) and age (r = 0.567, p = 0.0001) correlated with S(A). S(A) showed a tighter, inverse correlation with 2-h glucose levels (r = -0.58, p = 0.0003) than total adiponectin (r = -0.38, p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: This study demonstrates the importance of the S(A) index as a better determinant of glucose intolerance than measurements of total adiponectin. Our findings suggest that HMW adiponectin is the active form of the protein.
Authors: A H Kissebah; G E Sonnenberg; J Myklebust; M Goldstein; K Broman; R G James; J A Marks; G R Krakower; H J Jacob; J Weber; L Martin; J Blangero; A G Comuzzie Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2000-12-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: A G Comuzzie; T Funahashi; G Sonnenberg; L J Martin; H J Jacob; A E Black; D Maas; M Takahashi; S Kihara; S Tanaka; Y Matsuzawa; J Blangero; D Cohen; A Kissebah Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: K Hotta; T Funahashi; Y Arita; M Takahashi; M Matsuda; Y Okamoto; H Iwahashi; H Kuriyama; N Ouchi; K Maeda; M Nishida; S Kihara; N Sakai; T Nakajima; K Hasegawa; M Muraguchi; Y Ohmoto; T Nakamura; S Yamashita; T Hanafusa; Y Matsuzawa Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Utpal B Pajvani; Xueliang Du; Terry P Combs; Anders H Berg; Michael W Rajala; Therese Schulthess; Jürgen Engel; Michael Brownlee; Philipp E Scherer Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2002-12-20 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Utpal B Pajvani; Meredith Hawkins; Terry P Combs; Michael W Rajala; Tom Doebber; Joel P Berger; John A Wagner; Margaret Wu; Annemie Knopps; Anny H Xiang; Kristina M Utzschneider; Steven E Kahn; Jerrold M Olefsky; Thomas A Buchanan; Philipp E Scherer Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2003-12-29 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: T Yamauchi; J Kamon; Y Minokoshi; Y Ito; H Waki; S Uchida; S Yamashita; M Noda; S Kita; K Ueki; K Eto; Y Akanuma; P Froguel; F Foufelle; P Ferre; D Carling; S Kimura; R Nagai; B B Kahn; T Kadowaki Journal: Nat Med Date: 2002-10-07 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: P M Catalano; M Hoegh; J Minium; L Huston-Presley; S Bernard; S Kalhan; S Hauguel-De Mouzon Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2006-05-11 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Edmond P Wickham; Kai I Cheang; John N Clore; Jean-Patrice Baillargeon; John E Nestler Journal: Metabolism Date: 2010-03-31 Impact factor: 8.694
Authors: Sridevi Devaraj; Michael M Swarbrick; Uma Singh; Beverley Adams-Huet; Peter J Havel; Ishwarlal Jialal Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: Cristina Lara-Castro; Erin C Doud; Patrick C Tapia; Andres J Munoz; Jose R Fernandez; Gary R Hunter; Barbara A Gower; W Timothy Garvey Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2008-09-25 Impact factor: 5.002