Literature DB >> 15902181

The impact of occiput posterior fetal head position on the risk of anal sphincter injury in forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries.

Lorena Benavides1, Jennifer M Wu, Andrew F Hundley, Thomas S Ivester, Anthony G Visco.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A forceps-assisted vaginal delivery is a well-recognized risk factor for anal sphincter injury. Some studies have shown that occiput posterior (OP) fetal head position is also associated with an increased risk for third- or fourth-degree lacerations. The objective of this study was to assess whether OP position confers an incrementally increased risk for anal sphincter injury above that present with forceps deliveries. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of 588 singleton, cephalic, forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries performed at our institution between January 1996 and October 2003. Maternal demographics, labor and delivery characteristics, and neonatal factors were examined. Statistical analysis consisted of univariate statistics, Student t test, chi2, and logistic regression.
RESULTS: The prevalence of occiput anterior (OA) and OP positions was 88.4% and 11.6%, respectively. The groups were similar in age, marital status, body mass index, use of epidural, frequency of inductions, episiotomies, and shoulder dystocias. The OA group had a higher frequency of rotational forceps (16.2% vs 5.9%, P = .03), greater birth weights (3304 +/- 526 g vs 3092 +/- 777 g, P = .004), and a larger percentage of white women (48.8% vs 34.3%, P = .04). Overall, 35% of forceps deliveries resulted in a third- or fourth-degree laceration. Anal sphincter injury occurred significantly more often in the OP group compared with the OA group (51.5% vs 32.9%, P = .003), giving an odds ratio of 2.2 (CI: 1.3-3.6). In a logistic regression model that controlled for occiput posterior position, maternal body mass index, race, length of second stage, episiotomy, birth weight, and rotational forceps, OP head position was 3.1 (CI: 1.6-6.2) times more likely to be associated with anal sphincter injury than OA head position.
CONCLUSION: Forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries have been associated with a greater risk for anal sphincter injury. Within this population of forceps deliveries, an OP position further increases the risk of third- or fourth-degree lacerations when compared with an OA position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15902181     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.11.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  9 in total

1.  Risk factors for birth canal lacerations in primiparous women.

Authors:  Rafael T Mikolajczyk; Jun Zhang; James Troendle; Linda Chan
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Trends in major modifiable risk factors for severe perineal trauma, 1996-2006.

Authors:  Bela Kudish; Robert J Sokol; Michael Kruger
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 3.561

Review 3.  Obstetric anal sphincter injuries: review of anatomical factors and modifiable second stage interventions.

Authors:  Dharmesh S Kapoor; Ranee Thakar; Abdul H Sultan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Severe perineal laceration during operative vaginal delivery: the impact of occiput posterior position.

Authors:  E Hirsch; R Elue; A Wagner; K Nelson; R K Silver; Y Zhou; M G Adams
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 2.521

5.  No reduction in instrumental vaginal births and no increased risk for adverse perineal outcome in nulliparous women giving birth on a birth seat: results of a Swedish randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Li Thies-Lagergren; Linda J Kvist; Kyllike Christensson; Ingegerd Hildingsson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Persistent Occiput Posterior position - OUTcomes following manual rotation (POP-OUT): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Hala Phipps; Jon A Hyett; Sabrina Kuah; John Pardey; Joanne Ludlow; Andrew Bisits; Felicity Park; David Kowalski; Bradley de Vries
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Instrumental rotation for persistent fetal occiput posterior position: a way to decrease maternal and neonatal injury?

Authors:  Fabien Vidal; Caroline Simon; Christelle Cristini; Catherine Arnaud; Olivier Parant
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  [Labour in women with scarred uterus in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: trial of scar and factors influencing the outcome].

Authors:  Félix Kitenge Wa Momat; Pierre Akilimali Zalagile; Faustin Chenge Mukalenge; Oscar Numbi Luboya; Cléophas Tshibangu Kalala; Désiré Mashinda; Gilles Grangé; Olivier Mukuku; Fanny Malonga Kaj; Chamy Cham Lubamba; Joseph Bagambe Bwama; Célestin Kayembe Mukoko; Jean Baptiste Kakoma; Justin Kizonde Kalungwe
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2017-06-01

9.  Duration of second stage of labor and instrumental delivery as risk factors for severe perineal lacerations: population-based study.

Authors:  Marija Simic; Sven Cnattingius; Gunnar Petersson; Anna Sandström; Olof Stephansson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 3.007

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.