Literature DB >> 15902176

Comparison of long-term outcomes of autologous fascia lata slings with Suspend Tutoplast fascia lata allograft slings for stress incontinence.

Andrew W McBride1, R Mark Ellerkmann, Alfred E Bent, Clifford F Melick.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to compare the objective and subjective long-term surgical outcomes in patients receiving Tutoplast fascia lata allograft slings with those receiving autograft slings for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). STUDY
DESIGN: We reviewed all patients (n = 71) undergoing suburethral sling with either autologous fascia lata (n = 39) or Tutoplast fascia lata (n = 32) for urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) from October 1, 1998, to August 1, 2001.
RESULTS: Of the original 71 patients, 47 were evaluated by objective and/or subjective means at a minimum of 2 years after surgery. Subjective quality of life measures, subjective continence, maximum urethral closure pressure, and bladder neck mobility were not different between the 2 groups. USI was demonstrated in 41.7% of allograft patients compared with no autograft patients (P = .007).
CONCLUSION: Although patient reported cure of SUI is high for both sling types, USI recurs at a significantly higher rate in Tutoplast slings compared with autologous slings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15902176     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.01.078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  9 in total

Review 1.  Pubovaginal sling materials and their outcomes.

Authors:  Ömer Bayrak; David Osborn; William Stuart Reynolds; Roger Roman Dmochowski
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2014-12

2.  Cadaveric fascia lata.

Authors:  Pamela A Moalli
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-06

3.  A randomised controlled trial comparing two autologous fascial sling techniques for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: short, medium and long-term follow-up.

Authors:  K Guerrero; A Watkins; S Emery; K Wareham; T Stephenson; V Logan; M Lucas
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-03-09

Review 4.  Tissue engineering as a potential alternative or adjunct to surgical reconstruction in treating pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  M Boennelycke; S Gras; G Lose
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Introducing a New Technique for Fascial Closure to Avoid Renal Allograft Compartment Syndrome in Pediatric Recipients: The Use of Tutoplast® Fascia Lata.

Authors:  Beatriz Bañuelos Marco; Berenice Bergel; Tamara Geppert; Dominik Müller; Anja Lingnau
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-06

6.  Biomaterials in urinary incontinence and treatment of their complications.

Authors:  Philippa Sangster; Roland Morley
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010-04

Review 7.  Biomaterials for pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: how can we do better?

Authors:  Giulia Gigliobianco; Sabiniano Roman Regueros; Nadir I Osman; Julio Bissoli; Anthony J Bullock; Chris R Chapple; Sheila MacNeil
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Developing Repair Materials for Stress Urinary Incontinence to Withstand Dynamic Distension.

Authors:  Christopher J Hillary; Sabiniano Roman; Anthony J Bullock; Nicola H Green; Christopher R Chapple; Sheila MacNeil
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Concomitant surgical correction of severe stress urinary incontinence and anterior vaginal wall prolapse by anterior vaginal wall wrap: 18 months outcomes.

Authors:  Mahtab Zargham; Farshid Alizadeh; Farhad Tadayyon; Mohammad-Hatef Khorrami; Kia Nouri-Mahdavi; Mohammad Reza Gharaati; Mohammad Hossein Izadpanahi; Mohammad Yazdani; Hamid Mazdak
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.852

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.