RATIONALE: Cerebrovascular reactivity to CO(2) provides an important counterregulatory mechanism that serves to minimize the change in H(+) at the central chemoreceptor, thereby stabilizing the breathing pattern in the face of perturbations in Pa(CO(2)). However, there are no studies relating cerebral circulation abnormality to the presence or absence of central sleep apnea in patients with heart failure. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether patients with congestive heart failure and central sleep apnea have an attenuated cerebrovascular responsibility to CO(2). METHODS: Cerebral blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery was measured in patients with stable congestive heart failure with (n = 9) and without (n = 8) central sleep apnea using transcranial ultrasound during eucapnia (room air), hypercapnia (inspired CO(2), 3 and 5%), and hypocapnia (voluntary hyperventilation). In addition, eight subjects with apnea and nine without apnea performed a 20-second breath-hold to investigate the dynamic cerebrovascular response to apnea. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The overall cerebrovascular reactivity to CO(2) (hyper- and hypocapnia) was lower in patients with apnea than in the control group (1.8 +/- 0.2 vs. 2.5 +/- 0.2%/mm Hg, p < 0.05), mainly due to the prominent reduction of cerebrovascular reactivity to hypocapnia (1.2 +/- 0.3 vs. 2.2 +/- 0.1%/mm Hg, p < 0.05). Similarly, brain blood flow demonstrated a smaller surge after a 20-second breath-hold (peak velocity, 119 +/- 4 vs. 141 +/- 8% of baseline, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients with central sleep apnea have a diminished cerebrovascular response to PET(CO(2)), especially to hypocapnia. The compromised cerebrovascular reactivity to CO(2) might affect stability of the breathing pattern by causing ventilatory overshooting during hypercapnia and undershooting during hypocapnia.
RATIONALE: Cerebrovascular reactivity to CO(2) provides an important counterregulatory mechanism that serves to minimize the change in H(+) at the central chemoreceptor, thereby stabilizing the breathing pattern in the face of perturbations in Pa(CO(2)). However, there are no studies relating cerebral circulation abnormality to the presence or absence of central sleep apnea in patients with heart failure. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether patients with congestive heart failure and central sleep apnea have an attenuated cerebrovascular responsibility to CO(2). METHODS: Cerebral blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery was measured in patients with stable congestive heart failure with (n = 9) and without (n = 8) central sleep apnea using transcranial ultrasound during eucapnia (room air), hypercapnia (inspired CO(2), 3 and 5%), and hypocapnia (voluntary hyperventilation). In addition, eight subjects with apnea and nine without apnea performed a 20-second breath-hold to investigate the dynamic cerebrovascular response to apnea. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The overall cerebrovascular reactivity to CO(2) (hyper- and hypocapnia) was lower in patients with apnea than in the control group (1.8 +/- 0.2 vs. 2.5 +/- 0.2%/mm Hg, p < 0.05), mainly due to the prominent reduction of cerebrovascular reactivity to hypocapnia (1.2 +/- 0.3 vs. 2.2 +/- 0.1%/mm Hg, p < 0.05). Similarly, brain blood flow demonstrated a smaller surge after a 20-second breath-hold (peak velocity, 119 +/- 4 vs. 141 +/- 8% of baseline, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION:Patients with central sleep apnea have a diminished cerebrovascular response to PET(CO(2)), especially to hypocapnia. The compromised cerebrovascular reactivity to CO(2) might affect stability of the breathing pattern by causing ventilatory overshooting during hypercapnia and undershooting during hypocapnia.
Authors: Ryan L Hoiland; Philip N Ainslie; Kevin W Wildfong; Kurt J Smith; Anthony R Bain; Chris K Willie; Glen Foster; Brad Monteleone; Trevor A Day Journal: J Physiol Date: 2015-01-14 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Ailiang Xie; James B Skatrud; Barbara Morgan; Bruno Chenuel; Rami Khayat; Kevin Reichmuth; Jenny Lin; Jerome A Dempsey Journal: J Physiol Date: 2006-08-24 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Jui-Lin Fan; Keith R Burgess; Kate N Thomas; Samuel J E Lucas; James D Cotter; Bengt Kayser; Karen C Peebles; Philip N Ainslie Journal: J Physiol Date: 2012-01-04 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Rami Khayat; William Abraham; Brian Patt; Vincent Brinkman; Jacob Wannemacher; Kyle Porter; David Jarjoura Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 5.712