Literature DB >> 15901450

Batch-to-batch consistency of human-derived gonadotrophin preparations compared with recombinant preparations.

Claudio Wolfenson1, Jose Groisman, Alicia S Couto, Martin Hedenfalk, Rita G Cortvrindt, Johan Ej Smitz, Sonja Jespersen.   

Abstract

Different gonadotrophin preparations derived from human urine or manufactured by recombinant technology are currently used in clinical practice for the treatment of infertility. It has been widely assumed that gonadotrophin products manufactured by recombinant technology have better batch-to-batch consistency compared with human-derived preparations and that this potentially will be shown to provide a more constant clinical response, but there is little evidence for either statement. This study compared the batch-to-batch consistency between urinary-derived and recombinant manufactured gonadotrophin preparations using standard analytical techniques, as well as a novel in-vitro follicle bioassay to evaluate the consistency of the biological response at the target organ. Oligosaccharide isoform profiling, immunoassay testing, size exclusion chromatography analysis and in-vitro bioassay testing of urinary derived gonadotrophin preparations (MENOPUR and BRAVELLE) confirm that these products display a high degree of batch-to-batch consistency, similar to recombinant FSH (GONAL-f) either filled by mass or bioassay. The data also suggest that the batch-to-batch variation is independent of the manufacturing procedure (filled-by-bioassay or filled-by-mass) for the recombinant preparation (Gonal-f), but that the total FSH bioactivity delivered from a single dose preparation after reconstitution differs between the two manufacturing procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15901450     DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60819-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  17 in total

1.  Exposing cultured mouse ovarian follicles under increased gonadotropin tonus to aromatizable androgens influences the steroid balance and reduces oocyte meiotic capacity.

Authors:  Sergio Romero; Johan Smitz
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  Effects of urinary and recombinant gonadotropins on in vitro maturation outcomes of mouse preantral follicles.

Authors:  Kyung Eui Park; Seung-Yup Ku; Kyung Cheon Jung; Hung Ching Liu; Yoon Young Kim; Yong Jin Kim; Seok Hyun Kim; Young Min Choi; Jung Gu Kim; Shin Yong Moon
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 3.060

3.  Early gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist start improves follicular synchronization and pregnancy outcome as compared to the conventional antagonist protocol.

Authors:  Chan Woo Park; Yu Im Hwang; Hwa Seon Koo; Inn Soo Kang; Kwang Moon Yang; In Ok Song
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2014-12-31

4.  Recombinant follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa in fertility treatment.

Authors:  Ahmed Gibreel; Siladitya Bhattacharya
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2010-02-04

Review 5.  In Vivo and In Vitro Impact of Carbohydrate Variation on Human Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Function.

Authors:  George R Bousfield; Jeffrey V May; John S Davis; James A Dias; T Rajendra Kumar
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 5.555

6.  Live-birth rates after HP-hMG stimulation in the long GnRH agonist protocol: association with mid-follicular hCG and progesterone concentrations, but not with LH concentrations.

Authors:  Joan-Carles Arce; Johan Smitz
Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 2.260

7.  Exogenous hCG activity, but not endogenous LH activity, is positively associated with live birth rates in anovulatory infertility.

Authors:  Joan-Carles Arce; Johan Smitz
Journal:  Hum Fertil (Camb)       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 2.767

8.  Subcutaneously administered Menopur, a new highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin, causes significantly fewer injection site reactions than Repronex in subjects undergoing in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  William R Keye; Bobby Webster; Richard Dickey; Stephen Somkuti; Jack Crain; M Joseph Scobey
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 5.211

9.  Controlled Ovarian Stimulation with recombinant-FSH plus recombinant-LH vs. human Menopausal Gonadotropin based on the number of retrieved oocytes: results from a routine clinical practice in a real-life population.

Authors:  Alberto Revelli; Grazia Pettinau; Gemma Basso; Andrea Carosso; Alessandro Ferrero; Cecilia Dallan; Stefano Canosa; Gianluca Gennarelli; Daniela Guidetti; Claudia Filippini; Chiara Benedetto
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 5.211

10.  Endocrine profile following stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone versus highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin.

Authors:  Antonio Requena; María Cruz; Francisco J Ruiz; Juan A García-Velasco
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.