Literature DB >> 15901358

Carbon dioxide for euthanasia: concerns regarding pain and distress, with special reference to mice and rats.

K M Conlee1, M L Stephens, A N Rowan, L A King.   

Abstract

Carbon dioxide (CO2) is the most commonly used agent for euthanasia of laboratory rodents, used on an estimated tens of millions of laboratory rodents per year worldwide, yet there is a growing body of evidence indicating that exposure to CO2 causes more than momentary pain and distress in these and other animals. We reviewed the available literature on the use of CO2 for euthanasia (as well as anaesthesia) and also informally canvassed laboratory animal personnel for their opinions regarding this topic. Our review addresses key issues such as CO2 flow rate and final concentration, presence of oxygen, and prefilled chambers (the animal is added to the chamber once a predetermined concentration and flow rate have been reached) versus gradual induction (the animal is put into an empty chamber and the gas agent(s) is gradually introduced at a fixed rate). Internationally, animal research standards specify that any procedure that would cause pain or distress in humans should be assumed to do so in non-human animals as well (Public Health Service 1986, US Department of Agriculture 1997, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 2000). European Union guidelines, however, specify a certain threshold of pain or distress, such as 'skilled insertion of a hypodermic needle', as the starting point at which regulation of the use of animals in experimental or other scientific procedures begins (Biotechnology Regulatory Atlas n.d.). There is clear evidence in the human literature that CO2 exposure is painful and distressful, while the non-human literature is equivocal. However, the fact that a number of studies do conclude that CO2 causes pain and distress in animals indicates a need for careful reconsideration of its use. Finally, this review offers recommendations for alternatives to the use of CO2 as a euthanasia agent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15901358     DOI: 10.1258/0023677053739747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Anim        ISSN: 0023-6772            Impact factor:   2.471


  40 in total

1.  Evaluation of the aesthetics of physical methods of euthanasia of anesthetized rats.

Authors:  Debra L Hickman; Steven W Johnson
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  Effect of different spectral transmittances through tinted animal cages on circadian metabolism and physiology in Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Melissa A Wren; Robert T Dauchy; John P Hanifin; Michael R Jablonski; Benjamin Warfield; George C Brainard; David E Blask; Steven M Hill; Tara G Ooms; Rudolf P Bohm
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.232

3.  The effect of light level, CO2 flow rate, and anesthesia on the stress response of mice during CO2 euthanasia.

Authors:  Karin Powell; Kelly Ethun; Douglas K Taylor
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 12.625

Review 4.  Review of Rodent Euthanasia Methods.

Authors:  Nirah H Shomer; Krystal H Allen-Worthington; Debra L Hickman; Mahesh Jonnalagadda; Joseph T Newsome; Andrea R Slate; Helen Valentine; Angelina M Williams; Michele Wilkinson
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 1.232

5.  Influence of Isoflurane Exposure for 15 Consecutive Days on Ovarian Function in Adult Female Mice.

Authors:  Xia-Nan Tang; Wen Yao; Hai-Xia Yao; Yi Zhang; Jing Yue
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2021-01-11

6.  The Choice of Euthanasia Method Affects Metabolic Serum Biomarkers.

Authors:  Paula Pierozan; Fredrik Jernerén; Yusuf Ransome; Oskar Karlsson
Journal:  Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 4.080

7.  Euthanasia by CO₂ inhalation affects potassium levels in mice.

Authors:  Ryan P Traslavina; Edward J King; Andrew S Loar; Elyn R Riedel; Michael S Garvey; Rodolfo Ricart-Arbona; Felix R Wolf; Suzana S Couto
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.232

8.  Physiologic, Behavioral, and Histologic Responses to Various Euthanasia Methods in C57BL/6NTac Male Mice.

Authors:  Gregory P Boivin; Michael A Bottomley; Patricia A Schiml; Lori Goss; Nadja Grobe
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 9.  Review of Intraperitoneal Injection of Sodium Pentobarbital as a Method of Euthanasia in Laboratory Rodents.

Authors:  Colin A Laferriere; Daniel Sj Pang
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 1.232

10.  Cardiovascular and Metabolic Responses to Carbon Dioxide Euthanasia in Conscious and Anesthetized Rats.

Authors:  Kathryn E Nichols; Kimberly L Holliday-White; Heather M Bogie; Kim M Swearingen; Megan S Fine; Jennifer Doyle; Scott R Tiesma
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 1.232

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.