Literature DB >> 1590115

Hidden costs of mobile mammography: is subsidization necessary?

R B Wolk1.   

Abstract

Two major impediments to an effective mammography program are inaccessibility and cost. This article itemizes the expenses associated with providing a mobile screening program accredited by the American College of Radiology (ACR) during a 3-year period. Mobile Diagnostics Inc. established a mobile mammography service in April 1987. A 36-ft (11-m) van is staffed by two registered technologists. The unit includes on-board processing and educational videotapes. Analysis of expenses for the years 1988, 1989, and 1990 does not include interpretation fees. A total of 3522 patients were examined in 1988, 4232 in 1989, and 5005 in 1990. Fixed operating expenses in 1988 were $70/examination and variable expenses were $13/examination, resulting in an average total cost per examination of $83. Fixed costs in 1989 were $63, variable costs were $15, and total costs were $78 per examination. Fixed costs in 1990 were $55, variable costs were $14, and total costs were $69 per examination. Many third parties, including Medicare, are contemplating a global screening fee in the $50-$60 range. An average payment of $55 would require examination of more than 6500 patients a year or 28 patients a day to break even. Our experience suggests that some form of subsidization may be necessary to sustain a mobile mammography service at those reimbursement levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1590115     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.158.6.1590115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  3 in total

1.  A mobile mammography pilot project to increase screening among Latina women of low socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Sarah B Massin-Short; Minerva A Grullón; Christine M Judge; Karen R Ruderman; Milagro Grullón; Vilma Lora
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Mobile mammography: assessment of self-referral in reaching medically underserved women.

Authors:  Monica E Peek; Jini Han
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 3.  Economic analysis of the breast cancer screening program used by the UK NHS: should the program be maintained?

Authors:  Robert Morton; Meelad Sayma; Manraj Singh Sura
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2017-03-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.