Literature DB >> 15899675

Do we measure bilirubin correctly anno 2005?

Joke J Apperloo1, Fedde van der Graaf, Volkher Scharnhorst, Huib L Vader.   

Abstract

We observed 30% discrepancy between liquid chemistry and dry chemistry analysers for the determination of total bilirubin in human adult serum samples, which were consistent with a 20% overestimation and 10% underestimation relative to a Jendrassik-Grof reference method, respectively. In contrast, standard reference material SRM916, which was recently recommended as being the most suitable material for attaining interlaboratory agreement, shows very good agreement on both types of analysers, as well as close to 100% recovery with respect to the reference method. We show that the liquid vs. dry bilirubin discrepancies seem to originate in the presence of either conjugated or delta-bilirubin. Our observations make it clear that good interlaboratory (or inter-analyser) agreement between bilirubin reference materials does not guarantee the same for bilirubin concentrations in human serum samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15899675     DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2005.092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  2 in total

1.  Newborns bilirubin concentration determined by different methods in relation to hematocrit and albumin level.

Authors:  Joanna Berska; Jolanta Bugajska; Krystyna Sztefko
Journal:  J Med Biochem       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Measurements of neonatal bilirubin and albumin concentrations: a need for improvement and quality control.

Authors:  Deirdre E van Imhoff; Peter H Dijk; Cas W Weykamp; Christa M Cobbaert; Christian V Hulzebos
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 3.183

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.