PURPOSE: We have investigated the role of sonography in the diagnosis of plantar fasciitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study evaluates 39 patients with plantar fasciitis and control group of 22 healthy volunteers. The plantar fascia thickness was measured 5 mm distal to the insertion of the calcaneus of plantar aponeurosis. Qualitative parameters such as decreased echogenity, biconvexity, perifascial fluid and calcification of plantar fascia were also noted. RESULTS: Mean plantar fascia thickness was measured 2.9 mm in patients with unilateral heel pain, 2.2 mm for contralateral normal heel and 2.5mm for control group. There was a statistically significant difference between heel with plantar fasciitis, contralateral normal heel and control groups (p=0.009 and 0.0001, respectively). Mean body mass index was 28 kg/m(2) in patients with heel pain and 25 kg/m2 in control group. Body mass index measurements were significantly different between plantar fasciitis and control groups. We found reduced plantar fascia echogenity in 16 cases (41%), calcaneal spur in 20 cases (51%), biconvex appearance in two cases (5.1%) and perifascial fluid in one case (2.5%). CONCLUSION: We conclude that in patients with plantar fasciitis, ultrasound may detect relatively small differences in plantar fascia thickness even in clinically unequivocal plantar fasciitis.
PURPOSE: We have investigated the role of sonography in the diagnosis of plantar fasciitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study evaluates 39 patients with plantar fasciitis and control group of 22 healthy volunteers. The plantar fascia thickness was measured 5 mm distal to the insertion of the calcaneus of plantar aponeurosis. Qualitative parameters such as decreased echogenity, biconvexity, perifascial fluid and calcification of plantar fascia were also noted. RESULTS: Mean plantar fascia thickness was measured 2.9 mm in patients with unilateral heel pain, 2.2 mm for contralateral normal heel and 2.5mm for control group. There was a statistically significant difference between heel with plantar fasciitis, contralateral normal heel and control groups (p=0.009 and 0.0001, respectively). Mean body mass index was 28 kg/m(2) in patients with heel pain and 25 kg/m2 in control group. Body mass index measurements were significantly different between plantar fasciitis and control groups. We found reduced plantar fascia echogenity in 16 cases (41%), calcaneal spur in 20 cases (51%), biconvex appearance in two cases (5.1%) and perifascial fluid in one case (2.5%). CONCLUSION: We conclude that in patients with plantar fasciitis, ultrasound may detect relatively small differences in plantar fascia thickness even in clinically unequivocal plantar fasciitis.
Authors: Carla Stecco; Ilaria Fantoni; Veronica Macchi; Mario Del Borrello; Andrea Porzionato; Carlo Biz; Raffaele De Caro Journal: J Anat Date: 2015-09-11 Impact factor: 2.610
Authors: Andrew M McMillan; Karl B Landorf; Joanna T Barrett; Hylton B Menz; Adam R Bird Journal: J Foot Ankle Res Date: 2009-11-13 Impact factor: 2.303
Authors: Lova Hasina Rajaonarison Ny Ony Narindra; Nicolas Fanantenana Herinirina; Holitiana Rakotonirina; Gabrielle Emmylou Andrianah; Hasina Dina Ranoharison; Rado Randriamboavonjy; Ahmad Ahmad Journal: J Med Ultrasound Date: 2019-02-26