Literature DB >> 15899022

Effect of luting agents and reconstruction techniques on the fracture resistance of pre-fabricated post systems.

S Toksavul1, M Toman, B Uyulgan, P Schmage, I Nergiz.   

Abstract

Fracture resistance and fracture modes of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors restored with different post-and-core systems covered with all-ceramic copings were evaluated. Ten samples were prepared for each group. Groups 1, 2 and 3 consisted of tooth-coloured post-and-core, zirconia post (Cosmopost) with a composite core (Tetric Ceram), zirconia post (Cosmopost) with a custom made ceramic core (Cosmo Ingot), glass fibre-reinforced post (FRC Postec) with a composite core (Tetric Ceram), respectively. Group 4 consisted of a titanium post (ERpost) with a composite core (Tetric Ceram). The control group (group 5) consisted of root-filled incisors without posts. Tooth-coloured posts were cemented in the roots using Variolink-2, while titanium posts were cemented in the roots using Harvard cement. The all-ceramic copings were cemented using Variolink-2. Static load was applied to 2 mm below the incisal edge on the palatinal surface of each sample until they were fractured. Fracture data were obtained and statistically analysed with One-way anova and a Tukey's test. The results of the means and standard deviations of the fracture resistance during static loading were: 497.5 +/- 61.94 (1), 474.61 +/- 96.84 (2), 494.61 +/- 104.67 (3), 581.34 +/- 105.36 (4), 420.42 +/- 127.48 (5). There were statistically significant differences between groups 4 and 5. Glass fibre-reinforced posts and composite cores (group 3) showed the most catastrophic failure. Consequently, zirconia ceramic posts can be used in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15899022     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01438.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  7 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of various post systems using different luting agents under tangential loading.

Authors:  Rajnish Aggarwal; Swati Gupta; Amrit Tandan; Narendra Kumar Gupta; Ravi Dwivedi; Renu Aggarwal
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2013-04-17

2.  [In vitro analysis of the effect of cyclic loading on the fracture resistance of teeth restored with different post and core systems].

Authors:  Li Ping; Zhu Zhimin
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2015-04

3.  Influence of Post Angulation between Coronal and Radicular Segment on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth.

Authors:  Satheesh B Haralur; Anas Abdullah Lahig; Yahya Ahmed Al Hudiry; Abdullah Hassan Al-Shehri; Ahmed Abdullah Al-Malwi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-08-01

4.  An assessment of fracture resistance of three composite resin core build-up materials on three prefabricated non-metallic posts, cemented in endodontically treated teeth: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Lalit Kumar; Bhupinder Pal; Prashant Pujari
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with Zirconia filler containing composite core material and fiber posts.

Authors:  Zaid Al Jeaidi
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

6.  Stress distribution on dentin-cement-post interface varying root canal and glass fiber post diameters. A three-dimensional finite element analysis based on micro-CT data.

Authors:  Priscilla Cardoso Lazari; Rodrigo Caldeira Nunes de Oliveira; Rodolfo Bruniera Anchieta; Erika Oliveira de Almeida; Amilcar Chagas Freitas Junior; Sidney Kina; Eduardo Passos Rocha
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.698

7.  Resistance to fracture of intraradicular posts made of biological materials.

Authors:  Karine Taís Aguiar Tavano; Adriana Maria Botelho; Dhelfeson Willya Douglas-de-Oliveira; Antonio Ferreira Avila; Rudolf Huebner
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 2.757

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.