Literature DB >> 15898906

Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: the method of choice in selected cases.

Tibor Flasko1, Endre Holman, Gabor Kovacs, Bela Tallai, Csaba Toth, Morshed A Salah.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate retrospectively the results and complication, efficacy, and safety rates of laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in the treatment of large, impacted ureteric stones.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between September 1994 and December 2003, 73 patients underwent 75 laparoscopic ureterolithotomies (LUL). Mid- and upper-ureteric stones were removed retroperitoneally in 69 cases (92%). Lower ureteric stones were removed transperitoneally in 6 cases (8%). There were 2 (3%) bilateral LULs in one session, 7 (10%) ipsilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and 6 (8%) ipsilateral ureteroscopy in the same session. The mean age of the patients was 39 years (range, 15-70 years). Mean stone size was 25 mm (range, 12-55 mm).
RESULTS: The success rate was 98.7%, with 1 patient (1.3%) requiring conversion to an open procedure. There were no major complications. Mean operative time was 45 minutes (range, 15-100 minutes). Postoperative analgesic medication was required for 1 day in 39 patients (52%). The postoperative hospital stay ranged from 2 to 5 days (mean, 3 days).
CONCLUSION: On the basis of our experience, laparoscopic ureterolithotomy is a safe and effective method for the treatment of large, dense, and impacted ureteric stones. In selected cases it can be the first choice of treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15898906     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2005.15.149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  5 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic urinary stone surgery: an updated evidence-based review.

Authors:  Andreas Skolarikos; Athanasios G Papatsoris; Stefanos Albanis; Dean Assimos
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-04-16

2.  Application of a temporary ureter clamp for retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy.

Authors:  Xingqiao Wen; Xiaojuan Li; Jie Situ; Youqiang Fang; Xiaodong Chen; Xingxing Ruan; Yu Wang; Xin Gao
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Prospective Randomized Comparison of Open versus Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy: Experience of a Single Center from Northern India.

Authors:  Manish Garg; Vishwajeet Singh; Rahul J Sinha; Satya N Sankhwar; Manoj Kumar; Amit Kumar; Jai Prakash; Pradeep Kumar; Mohit Pandey
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2013-10-30

4.  Comparative analysis of upper ureteral stones (> 15 mm) treated with retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy and ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy.

Authors:  YunYan Wang; JianQuan Hou; DuanGai Wen; Jun OuYang; JunSong Meng; HaiJun Zhuang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for proximal ureteral calculi in selected patients.

Authors:  Qingfeng Hu; Weihong Ding; Yuancheng Gou; Yatfaat Ho; Ke Xu; Bin Gu; Chuanyu Sun; Guowei Xia; Qiang Ding
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-12-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.